Has your paper been used to train an AI model? Almost certainly
Academic publishers are selling research papers to AI firms, raising copyright concerns. Major deals include Taylor & Francis with Microsoft and Wiley with another company, prompting legal disputes and researcher frustrations.
Read original articleAcademic publishers are increasingly selling access to research papers to technology firms for training artificial intelligence (AI) models, raising concerns about copyright and the lack of consultation with authors. Notable deals include Taylor & Francis's $10 million agreement with Microsoft and Wiley's $23 million deal with an unnamed company. Experts suggest that if a research paper hasn't been used yet, it likely will be soon, as AI models require vast amounts of data, often sourced from online content. The trend is growing, with other media outlets also offering their content for AI training. While some AI developers maintain open data sets, many keep their training data secret, complicating the ability to determine if specific papers were used. Legal disputes are emerging, such as The New York Times suing Microsoft and OpenAI for unauthorized use of its content. Although some researchers are indifferent to their work being included in AI training, many express frustration over the lack of control and fair compensation for their contributions. The ongoing discussions highlight the need for a balanced approach to the use of academic work in AI development, ensuring that authors' rights are respected while fostering innovation in AI technologies.
- Academic publishers are selling research papers to AI firms, raising copyright concerns.
- Major deals include Taylor & Francis with Microsoft and Wiley with an unnamed company.
- The trend of using academic papers for AI training is expected to grow.
- Legal disputes are emerging over unauthorized use of copyrighted content for AI training.
- Researchers express frustration over the lack of control and compensation for their work.
Related
Microsoft says that it's okay to steal web content it because it's 'freeware.'
Microsoft's CEO of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, believes web content is "freeware" for AI training unless specified otherwise. This stance has sparked legal disputes and debates over copyright infringement and fair use in AI content creation.
Microsoft CEO of AI Your online content is 'freeware' fodder for training models
Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, faced legal action for using online content as "freeware" to train neural networks. The debate raises concerns about copyright, AI training, and intellectual property rights.
OpenAI pleads it can't make money with o using copyrighted material for free
OpenAI requests British Parliament to permit copyrighted material for AI training. Facing legal challenges from NYT and Authors Guild for alleged copyright infringement. Debate impacts AI development and copyright protection, raising concerns for content creators.
Academics shocked after T&F sells access to their research to Microsoft AI
Academic authors express surprise as Taylor & Francis sells research access to Microsoft for £8m. Concerns arise over lack of transparency, author consultation, and compensation. Society of Authors stresses importance of rights protection.
The Data That Powers A.I. Is Disappearing Fast
A study highlights a decline in available data for training A.I. models due to restrictions from web sources, affecting A.I. developers and companies like OpenAI, Google, and Meta. Challenges prompt exploration of new data access tools and alternative training methods.
Related
Microsoft says that it's okay to steal web content it because it's 'freeware.'
Microsoft's CEO of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, believes web content is "freeware" for AI training unless specified otherwise. This stance has sparked legal disputes and debates over copyright infringement and fair use in AI content creation.
Microsoft CEO of AI Your online content is 'freeware' fodder for training models
Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, faced legal action for using online content as "freeware" to train neural networks. The debate raises concerns about copyright, AI training, and intellectual property rights.
OpenAI pleads it can't make money with o using copyrighted material for free
OpenAI requests British Parliament to permit copyrighted material for AI training. Facing legal challenges from NYT and Authors Guild for alleged copyright infringement. Debate impacts AI development and copyright protection, raising concerns for content creators.
Academics shocked after T&F sells access to their research to Microsoft AI
Academic authors express surprise as Taylor & Francis sells research access to Microsoft for £8m. Concerns arise over lack of transparency, author consultation, and compensation. Society of Authors stresses importance of rights protection.
The Data That Powers A.I. Is Disappearing Fast
A study highlights a decline in available data for training A.I. models due to restrictions from web sources, affecting A.I. developers and companies like OpenAI, Google, and Meta. Challenges prompt exploration of new data access tools and alternative training methods.