Disney Says Disney+ Terms of Service Prevent Lawsuit over Resort Allergy Death

Disney is facing a wrongful death lawsuit related to an incident at Raglan Road Irish Pub and Restaurant in Disney Springs, where a British woman died from an allergic reaction. The lawsuit was filed by her husband, Jeffrey Piccolo, who claims negligence on Disney's part. In response, Disney's legal team argues that the terms of service for Disney+, which Piccolo agreed to during a free trial in 2019, include an arbitration clause that prevents him from pursuing a lawsuit. Disney contends that this agreement extends to all interactions with the company, including ticket purchases for the theme park. Piccolo's lawyers challenge this assertion, stating that it is unreasonable to claim that signing up for a streaming service could waive the right to a jury trial in a serious case like wrongful death. Legal experts suggest that this case raises significant questions about the applicability of contract law in such contexts. The case is currently being heard in British court, and it remains to be seen how the courts will interpret the relationship between the streaming service's user agreement and the serious allegations of negligence at a theme park.

- Disney argues that its streaming service's terms prevent lawsuits related to incidents at its theme parks.

- The wrongful death lawsuit was filed after a woman died from an allergic reaction at a Disney restaurant.

- Disney claims the arbitration clause in the Disney+ agreement applies to all interactions with the company.

- Legal experts are questioning the validity of extending streaming service agreements to serious legal matters.

- The case is currently being adjudicated in British court.