A comparison of 22 Arenas in Rust
Arenas are memory management structures that efficiently allocate large memory chunks for small objects, maintaining stable addresses and offering various implementations tailored to specific performance and data management needs.
Read original article
Arenas are specialized memory management structures that allow for efficient storage and allocation of data without relying on the system allocator. They are particularly useful for managing many small objects that can be deallocated together, improving performance. Unlike standard vectors, which may move data around in memory as they grow, arenas allocate large chunks of memory and maintain stable addresses for their elements. This stability is crucial when elements need to be referenced while new objects are added. Various arena implementations exist, each with unique properties, such as supporting single or mixed data types, memory reuse strategies, and iteration capabilities. Some libraries, like elsa and rpds, offer alternative data structures that may be more suitable depending on the use case. The overview includes a comparison of different arena types based on their features, such as memory management, concurrency support, and whether they run destructors for stored elements. The choice of arena depends on specific requirements, including performance needs and the nature of the data being managed.
- Arenas provide efficient memory management for small objects by allocating large memory chunks.
- They maintain stable addresses for elements, unlike standard vectors that may move data.
- Various implementations exist, each with different properties and use cases.
- Some libraries offer alternative data structures that may be more efficient for certain applications.
- The choice of arena should be based on specific performance and data management needs.
Related
Tracing garbage collection for arenas
Tracing garbage collection in systems programming languages like C++, Rust, and Ada is compared to reference counting. A simplified tracing garbage collection approach inspired by Mark-and-Sweep is proposed for languages like Zig or Odin.
How much memory does a call to 'malloc' allocate?
The malloc function in C allocates memory on the heap. Allocating 1 byte incurs an 8-byte overhead. Memory alignment may result in 16-24 bytes. Avoid small allocations for efficiency; consider realloc for extensions.
How much memory does a call to 'malloc' allocates? – Daniel Lemire's blog
The malloc function in C allocates memory on the heap. Allocating 1 byte may result in 16-24 bytes due to overhead. Avoid small allocations and focus on broader concepts for efficient memory management.
Malloc() and free() are a bad API (2022)
The post delves into malloc() and free() limitations in C, proposing a new interface with allocate(), deallocate(), and try_expand(). It discusses C++ improvements and emphasizes the significance of a robust API.
JavaScript Garbage Collection and Closures
Jake Archibald explains JavaScript garbage collection, highlighting how closures can cause memory leaks by retaining references to large objects. Understanding these mechanics is crucial for effective memory management.
2 commentsRelated
Tracing garbage collection for arenas
Tracing garbage collection in systems programming languages like C++, Rust, and Ada is compared to reference counting. A simplified tracing garbage collection approach inspired by Mark-and-Sweep is proposed for languages like Zig or Odin.
How much memory does a call to 'malloc' allocate?
The malloc function in C allocates memory on the heap. Allocating 1 byte incurs an 8-byte overhead. Memory alignment may result in 16-24 bytes. Avoid small allocations for efficiency; consider realloc for extensions.
How much memory does a call to 'malloc' allocates? – Daniel Lemire's blog
The malloc function in C allocates memory on the heap. Allocating 1 byte may result in 16-24 bytes due to overhead. Avoid small allocations and focus on broader concepts for efficient memory management.
Malloc() and free() are a bad API (2022)
The post delves into malloc() and free() limitations in C, proposing a new interface with allocate(), deallocate(), and try_expand(). It discusses C++ improvements and emphasizes the significance of a robust API.
JavaScript Garbage Collection and Closures
Jake Archibald explains JavaScript garbage collection, highlighting how closures can cause memory leaks by retaining references to large objects. Understanding these mechanics is crucial for effective memory management.