The Apple IIGS Megahertz Myth – Userlandia
The Apple IIGS, launched in 1986 with a 2.8MHz CPU, faced development challenges and limitations due to technical issues, not intentional speed restrictions to protect the Macintosh.
Read original articleThe article discusses the Apple IIGS and the myths surrounding its processing speed, particularly the belief that Apple intentionally limited its CPU speed to avoid competition with the Macintosh. The IIGS, launched in 1986, featured a GTE 65SC816 CPU clocked at 2.8MHz, significantly slower than its contemporaries like the Motorola 68000. Despite claims that the IIGS could have operated at higher speeds, such as 4MHz or even 8MHz, the reality was that the necessary chips were not available at launch. The article traces the development history of the IIGS, highlighting the challenges faced, including delays in CPU availability and the complexities of integrating new technology. It also addresses the speculation about Steve Jobs' influence on the IIGS's development, noting that he had lost significant power at Apple by the time the IIGS was released. Ultimately, the article concludes that the limitations of the IIGS were more a result of technical challenges and timing rather than deliberate corporate strategy.
- The Apple IIGS was launched in 1986 with a CPU clocked at 2.8MHz.
- Myths suggest Apple limited the IIGS's speed to protect the Macintosh, but evidence does not support this.
- The IIGS faced significant development challenges, including delays in CPU availability.
- Steve Wozniak's early predictions about the IIGS's potential speed were overly optimistic.
- The IIGS's performance was constrained by technical limitations rather than corporate decisions.
Related
Apple II graphics: More than you wanted to know
The article explores Apple II graphics, emphasizing its historical importance and technical features like pixel-addressable graphics and sixteen colors. It contrasts with competitors and delves into synchronization challenges and hardware details.
The Apple II shows how amazing the C64 was
Ruben Schade, a tech writer and IaaS engineer, shared his experience with retro computers, favoring the Apple //e despite being a "Commodore guy." He praised the Apple //e's charm, expandability, and value proposition over the Commodore 64, acknowledging the C64's superior graphics and sound. Schade plans to enhance his Apple //e setup with modern reproductions, emphasizing its unique appeal for retro computing.
Inside an IBM/Motorola mainframe controller chip from 1981
The IBM 3274 Control Unit chip from 1981, SC81150R, was examined, revealing IBM and Motorola collaboration. It featured a 16x16 memory block, PLAs, and a 16-bit bus. The chip specialized in data handling, lacking ROM and microcode, with a unique memory buffer design. The analysis highlighted vintage mainframe technology complexity.
That Time Apple Told Apple III Customers to Drop Their Computers
Apple faced design flaws with the Apple III in the 1980s, causing overheating and chip dislodgment. Support engineers advised dropping the computer to reset circuits. Despite modifications, the reputation damage led to discontinuation in 1984.
The Commodore 900: A Look at a Rare Prototype
A rare prototype, the Commodore 900, based on Zilog Z8001 CPU for UNIX workstations, was never sold despite OS porting. Commodore's focus on home computers and acquisition of Amiga influenced its cancellation. The C900's Z8000 CPU couldn't compete, leading to missed market opportunities.
- Several users share personal experiences and technical challenges related to early computing, highlighting the complexity of hardware development.
- There is a sense of loss regarding the diversity of computing platforms from that era, with many reminiscing about the unique characteristics of different systems.
- Comments emphasize the rapid evolution of technology during the 70s and 80s, likening it to an "evolutionary tree" of personal computing.
- Users express admiration for the engineering feats of the time, including the design of CPUs and the performance of older machines.
- Some comments reflect on the cultural perception of computers in households during that period, noting how unusual they seemed to the general public.
Every platform represented a unique branch in an evolutionary tree undergoing incredibly rapid evolutionary permutations. Each with their own clubs, offset-printed zines and software libraries, none compatible with the others. Few people outside some universities and corporations had ever touched a self-contained computer and no one in my family's extended social circles even had a computer at home! I remember it striking most people as simply being weird, prompting questions with a tone akin to "I heard you have a personal dirigible at your house. Um... what would you even do with that?"
No one knew what the future of computing would look like and we certainly never imagined that by the late 90s, the wild explosion of early diversity would have encountered an asteroid-scale die-off, shrinking to a single major survivor with a distant second place in household computers - leaving behind a landscape which felt shockingly empty compared to the wildly diverse frontier only a decade earlier.
Managed to figure out that the machines that worked had an ADB (keyboard) chip with markings on it, the ones that didn't had no markings - Apple swore they were the same, eventually told us the ones that didn't work were the ones the were doing the manufacturing run with ..... bug from hell ..... turns out there was some circuitry in there they were quite proud of, when you accessed the parallel IO (VIA) chip it tweaked the clock phase a little to give you faster access, part of working with the IWM chip involved setting up the timer in the VIA chip to time when the next sector would go by, we'd poll the timer fast enough to tweak the clock on every clock cycle resulting in the ADB chip which was connected to the VIA being clocked too fast .... we replaced that code with a simple delay loop
I remember our school computer lab had a whole bunch of Apple IIe's, a single Mac, and a single IIGS. The GS was by far the most coveted because (unlike most Macs of that era) it had a COLOUR screen and could play relatively advanced games. Eventually they upgraded to mostly Macs.
Dad ended up buying a 386 PC, which was probably for the best. Those SVGA graphics!
"Way back in '85, a 4MHz '816 cost noticably more than an 8MHz 68000."
( From Dave Haynie, https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.apple/c/RH1-BNz8x-c/m/3... )
I wonder at what other clocks did the WDC 65C02 support?
Related
Apple II graphics: More than you wanted to know
The article explores Apple II graphics, emphasizing its historical importance and technical features like pixel-addressable graphics and sixteen colors. It contrasts with competitors and delves into synchronization challenges and hardware details.
The Apple II shows how amazing the C64 was
Ruben Schade, a tech writer and IaaS engineer, shared his experience with retro computers, favoring the Apple //e despite being a "Commodore guy." He praised the Apple //e's charm, expandability, and value proposition over the Commodore 64, acknowledging the C64's superior graphics and sound. Schade plans to enhance his Apple //e setup with modern reproductions, emphasizing its unique appeal for retro computing.
Inside an IBM/Motorola mainframe controller chip from 1981
The IBM 3274 Control Unit chip from 1981, SC81150R, was examined, revealing IBM and Motorola collaboration. It featured a 16x16 memory block, PLAs, and a 16-bit bus. The chip specialized in data handling, lacking ROM and microcode, with a unique memory buffer design. The analysis highlighted vintage mainframe technology complexity.
That Time Apple Told Apple III Customers to Drop Their Computers
Apple faced design flaws with the Apple III in the 1980s, causing overheating and chip dislodgment. Support engineers advised dropping the computer to reset circuits. Despite modifications, the reputation damage led to discontinuation in 1984.
The Commodore 900: A Look at a Rare Prototype
A rare prototype, the Commodore 900, based on Zilog Z8001 CPU for UNIX workstations, was never sold despite OS porting. Commodore's focus on home computers and acquisition of Amiga influenced its cancellation. The C900's Z8000 CPU couldn't compete, leading to missed market opportunities.