August 17th, 2024

New Win11 insider build blocks install on older hardware, prevents TPM bypass

Microsoft's patch in Windows 11 Insider Build 27686 blocks a command line trick for installing on unsupported CPUs, indicating stricter hardware requirements and prompting users to consider alternatives or upgrades.

Read original articleLink Icon
New Win11 insider build blocks install on older hardware, prevents TPM bypass

Microsoft has implemented a patch in its Windows 11 Insider Build 27686 that blocks a previously used command line trick allowing users with unsupported CPUs to install Windows 11. This method, which involved using the '/product server' command, had enabled many older PC owners to bypass hardware requirement checks, including the need for TPM 2.0. Although the current Windows 11 24H2 version still works with this bypass, the new patch indicates that Microsoft is tightening its restrictions on hardware compatibility. Users with older CPUs, such as Intel's Core2Duo and AMD's Athlon, may now face challenges in upgrading to Windows 11, as Microsoft has phased out support for these systems. The patch is part of a broader trend where Microsoft is enforcing stricter hardware requirements, which could lead users to consider alternatives like older Windows 10 versions, Linux, or hardware upgrades. While other installation methods may still exist, it is anticipated that Microsoft will continue to address these bypasses in future updates.

- Microsoft has patched a command line trick that allowed unsupported CPUs to install Windows 11.

- The patch is included in Windows 11 Insider Build 27686, indicating stricter hardware requirements.

- Users with older CPUs may need to consider alternatives like Windows 10, Linux, or hardware upgrades.

- The current Windows 11 version still works with the bypass, but future updates may eliminate this option.

- Microsoft is phasing out support for older systems, impacting many users.

Link Icon 7 comments
By @mrandish - 5 months
I've been using Windows daily since 3.1 and, while there are been some digressions at various points over the years, MSFT always eventually managed to course correct and get things back on track. But I gave up on Windows 11 a few months ago and am slowly migrating all my Win11 systems back to Win10.

I gave up because it's been over three years during which MSFT has repeatedly demonstrated the Windows business is being operated with fundamentally different priorities in the Win11 era than it ever has been. The myriad things which have been removed from Win11 and the new things which are annoying on a daily basis are not regressions. They're not going to be fixed because these new priorities are now part of MSFT's core strategy for the Windows business. They have prioritized incessantly promoting adjacent subscription businesses and de-prioritized making Windows a complete, feature-rich, functional and streamlined tool for individual power users.

For the past 30 years, Windows has generally gotten better for users like me (with a few detours, which were corrected). It's not that MSFT always did everything the way I'd prefer but, even when we disagreed on implementation, we remained largely in sync on the overall goals. Since Win11, it's become clear that Microsoft's interests are no longer mostly aligned with my own interests as an individual power user.

By @a2128 - 5 months
If Microsoft cares about the environment and becoming carbon-negative by 2030, why the seemingly arbitrary hardware restrictions that are pushing consumers to replace hardware that's still modest today?
By @add-sub-mul-div - 5 months
In the old days I remember various custom (unofficial) builds of Windows XP etc. that stripped it down to basics. And then that scene went away as storage and cpu became plentiful and it was simpler to disable various annoyances through the official means.

But I hope that scene gets revived if/when they get rid of local accounts altogether, and this would be another thing that would make custom builds attractive again.

By @Scharkenberg - 5 months
FYI this is a Windows vNext build and the current placeholder name for its development branch is XY30H1. It is not launching anytime soon.
By @Habgdnv - 5 months
I am having problems switching to Linux because of my relatives and ignorant companies. One hard example is that all kids in my daughter school play roblox games, and roblox go to great extent to make sure you're on native windows without emulator or VM or anything. Baremetal windows only. I do not want to force my kid to be the weird outsider who don't play roblox with friends because of a crazy IT father. Because of my work I offc use enterprise editions and have AD at home with GPOs so no forced reboots and no online accounts and not ads etc, but if things start to get uglier my escape plan is to install windows server. As they say - It's not much but its dishonest work.
By @ChocolateGod - 5 months
I still can't enable the TPM on my AMD Zen 3 PC without getting random hitches (I've applied all firmware updates and tried switching to a hardware TPM), guess back to Windows 10 I go.
By @easton - 5 months
Why does LTSC not have the same requirement? I could understand the IoT builds, but LTSC is made for user workstations I thought?