AI Cheating Is Getting Worse
Colleges are grappling with AI-generated cheating, prompting educators to seek new teaching methods. Many feel demoralized, with some considering leaving the profession due to declining trust in students.
Read original articleColleges are struggling to address the challenges posed by AI tools like ChatGPT, which have made cheating easier and more prevalent among students. As the academic year begins, educators are increasingly concerned about the integrity of their courses, with many reporting widespread use of AI-generated content in assignments. Traditional methods of discouraging cheating, such as honor codes, have proven insufficient. Faculty members are seeking coherent strategies to manage the situation, but current detection tools are inadequate. Some educators are experimenting with integrating AI into their teaching, using it as a tool for learning rather than merely a means to cheat. For instance, Arizona State University is developing generative-AI literacy programs, while other institutions are encouraging students to engage with AI in a reflective manner. However, the ongoing arms race between AI detection technologies and student cheating continues to complicate the landscape. Many educators feel demoralized, with some considering leaving the profession due to the erosion of trust in students. The consensus among educators is that a fundamental change in teaching methods is necessary to adapt to the realities of AI in education, moving away from traditional assignment formats that are easily replicated by AI.
- Colleges are facing significant challenges with AI-generated cheating.
- Traditional methods to prevent cheating, like honor codes, are proving ineffective.
- Some educators are integrating AI into their teaching to enhance learning.
- There is a growing consensus that teaching methods need to evolve to address AI's impact.
- Many educators feel demoralized and are reconsidering their careers due to trust issues with students.
Related
AI can beat real university students in exams, study suggests
A study from the University of Reading reveals AI outperforms real students in exams. AI-generated answers scored higher, raising concerns about cheating. Researchers urge educators to address AI's impact on assessments.
Google Researchers Publish Paper About How AI Is Ruining the Internet
Google researchers warn that generative AI contributes to the spread of fake content, complicating the distinction between truth and deception, and potentially undermining public understanding and accountability in digital information.
The Impact of AI on Computer Science Education
AI is impacting computer science education and the job market, with studies showing mixed effects on learning. Curricula will adapt, emphasizing responsible AI, while new job roles will emerge alongside automation.
Jobhunters flood recruiters with AI-generated CVS
Around 50% of job seekers use AI tools for applications, leading to lower quality submissions. Employers, especially in accounting, discourage AI use, emphasizing the need for human interaction in recruitment.
Why AI is no substitute for human teachers
A study from the Wharton School found high school students using generative AI for math prep perform worse on exams, highlighting the need for guidance and the importance of human teachers.
College writing will go the way of calligraphy. Colleges and the faculty that staff them need to keep up with the times or risk being obsoleted. Instead of teaching students to write, they should instead offer courses on prompt engineering and how to get the LLMs to spit out what is needed, in a minimum amount of time.
And let's face it -- most people are being prepared for the life of a corporate worker or laborer. I'd argue a great number of people don't need college. Cheating is widespread because there are people in those courses who aren't interested in the material. A quick course in how to compose an email, workplace communication should be all that is needed for most white collar workers. Those who really want to study writing should be offered the courses as an artistic, historical and anachronistic pursuit and those courses should definitely not be financed on the tax payer's dime.
But in school teachers are focused on cramming info into kids heads instead of teaching them how to self learn. It’s like “give a kid a fish feed him for a day”. If you teach kids how to self learn then give them fun projects, they will naturally collaborate, use ai, and be totally prepared for life!
They would be much better off if they spent time studying real world problems and using ai to make kid level solutions in my opinion.
But wait, you say, won't they get a degree that they didn't earn? Doesn't matter: Right now anyone can just claim to have any degree they want. Universities will not confirm or deny if a particular party got a degree, citing privacy laws. Lying about degrees is probably widespread, we only hear about the few extremely uncommon cases where its caught and the perpetrator was someone high profile.
Even as it is, without/prior-to AI plenty of people manage to actually earn respectable looking degrees that turn out to be utter imbeciles in practice.
There are greater abuses of AI we ought to be concerned about.
Related
AI can beat real university students in exams, study suggests
A study from the University of Reading reveals AI outperforms real students in exams. AI-generated answers scored higher, raising concerns about cheating. Researchers urge educators to address AI's impact on assessments.
Google Researchers Publish Paper About How AI Is Ruining the Internet
Google researchers warn that generative AI contributes to the spread of fake content, complicating the distinction between truth and deception, and potentially undermining public understanding and accountability in digital information.
The Impact of AI on Computer Science Education
AI is impacting computer science education and the job market, with studies showing mixed effects on learning. Curricula will adapt, emphasizing responsible AI, while new job roles will emerge alongside automation.
Jobhunters flood recruiters with AI-generated CVS
Around 50% of job seekers use AI tools for applications, leading to lower quality submissions. Employers, especially in accounting, discourage AI use, emphasizing the need for human interaction in recruitment.
Why AI is no substitute for human teachers
A study from the Wharton School found high school students using generative AI for math prep perform worse on exams, highlighting the need for guidance and the importance of human teachers.