August 20th, 2024

'It could disappear for ever': Anger over sale of George Orwell archive

The sale of George Orwell's archive has provoked outrage among scholars, with concerns about losing significant documents to private collectors, highlighting the need for preserving literary heritage.

Read original articleLink Icon
'It could disappear for ever': Anger over sale of George Orwell archive

The sale of George Orwell's archive, which includes significant correspondence and contracts from his original publisher, Victor Gollancz, has sparked outrage among literary scholars and fans. The decision to sell the archive was made by the publisher's parent company in 2018 due to the closure of a warehouse. Critics describe the act as "cultural vandalism," fearing that these invaluable documents could be lost to private collectors. Richard Blair, Orwell's son, expressed his dismay, noting that once sold, the materials could vanish forever. The archive contains crucial documents related to Orwell's major works, including letters about the rejection of "Animal Farm" and contracts for "A Clergyman’s Daughter" and "Keep the Aspidistra Flying." Antiquarian booksellers are currently offering these documents for substantial sums, with some items priced at £100,000. Experts have criticized the publisher for failing to recognize the archive's historical significance and for not consulting with historians before deciding to sell. The situation highlights a broader issue regarding the preservation of literary heritage, as many authors today are more aware of the importance of their archives. Richard Blair has taken steps to preserve some of his father's letters by purchasing them for donation to the Orwell Archive at University College London. The ongoing sale of Orwell's papers raises concerns about the future accessibility of important literary materials.

- The sale of George Orwell's archive has been criticized as "cultural vandalism."

- Significant documents related to Orwell's works are being sold to private collectors.

- Richard Blair, Orwell's son, fears the materials could be lost forever.

- Experts lament the publisher's lack of understanding of the archive's value.

- The situation underscores the importance of preserving literary heritage.

Related

500k Books Have Been Deleted from the Internet Archive's Lending Library

500k Books Have Been Deleted from the Internet Archive's Lending Library

500,000 books removed from Internet Archive's Open Library due to publishers' lawsuit. Legal battle restricts eBook lending, aiming to control distribution and pricing, challenging libraries' role in providing access to information.

Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win

The Internet Archive removed 500,000 books due to a court ruling favoring publishers. The organization is appealing, arguing for fair use. Supporters stress the impact on education and access to information.

Paper Trails

Paper Trails

Archives shape philosophers' reputations. Husserl's saved archive aids philosophers like Derrida. Nietzsche's archive, twisted by his sister, promoted antisemitism. Archiving impacts posthumous legacy and public perception, showcasing the political nature of preserving philosophers' work.

Appeals court seems lost on how Internet Archive harms publishers

Appeals court seems lost on how Internet Archive harms publishers

An appeals court reviews Internet Archive's digital lending defended against copyright claims. 500,000 books removed, sparking debate. Court focuses on publishers' profits. Archive argues for fair use and equal access. Decision pending, could impact digital libraries and set copyright precedent.

Cartoon Network's Website Was Deleted. That Should Scare You All

Cartoon Network's Website Was Deleted. That Should Scare You All

David Zaslav, CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, faces backlash for management decisions harming cultural heritage, including film cancellations and website shutdowns, leading to financial struggles and concerns over media preservation.

Link Icon 10 comments
By @FerretFred - about 2 months
“cultural vandalism” indeed! It's ironic then that a nation that pride itself on preserving tradition should allow its national broadcaster the BBC to destroy early archives in the 60s/70s (https://www.quora.com/Why-was-there-a-purge-of-the-BBC-archi...). "Who would want to watch a program twice?" and "Wow, isn't storage expensive?!" Orwell would have turned in his grave.
By @jemmyw - about 2 months
Controversial take maybe, but who really gives a damn? Filing cabinets that haven't been opened for 50 years? I'm sure people would flock to a museum to see those /s. Researchers obviously weren't that interested. If private collectors are happy to pay large amounts for these things then that seems like the best option, they'll enjoy owning it.

We really don't need the minutia of every decision Orwell made while writing his stories, I'd go so far as to say agonizing over such devalues the work.

By @pbhjpbhj - about 2 months
In UK we have legislation that protects buildings if they're significant (eg peculiar, famous, old). Perhaps we should have a law requiring digitisation of significant artefacts (at public expense) in order to sell works that may be of historical/cultural significance.

Honestly, I couldn't care less about keeping original documents, but preserving images of those documents seems reasonable.

Same would go for selling artwork or artefacts, offer true opportunity to national museums to retain a digital copy.

Fwiw, I like old artefacts, papers, books, even rusty old filling cabinets, but I don't see value for the country in preserving those things.

Also fwiw, I think the Listed Building laws go a bit far in some cases: preventing people's reasonable enjoyment of their own properties.

By @pcf - about 2 months
The UK is moving rapidly towards 1984, so it only seems fitting that Orwell's letters and various material should just be... memory-holed.

And at the very end of the day, no one will understand why "He loved Big Brother" was not a happy ending.

By @bell-cot - about 2 months
Before this hit the news - how many of the now-angry people had previously demonstrated any real interest in the George Orwell archives? Or had actually worked to preserve any collection of historical documents?

It's real easy to sit on your ass, while bitterly complaining that a whole legion of Somebody Elses is not working 25-hour days, for free, to make the world conform to your whims.

By @tweetle_beetle - about 2 months
“That nobody had opened those filing cabinets for 50 years was because they were idiots and didn’t understand the archive’s value."

But who is it valuable to? Ultimately a great deal of this is purely interesting to the increasing small number of people who are personally or professionally invested in Orwell. The value here is that the archive could generate a couple of conference keynotes for professors, a new foreword in a reprint, or, at a stretch, a new biography.

There is a very small chance that enough new material, or changes to material, could merit a brand new publication, but ultimately the existing published works stand by themselves and the rest amounts to high brow gossip.

By @micheljansen - about 2 months
'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.'
By @ggm - about 2 months
the UK government has a power to act if it wants.
By @verisimi - about 2 months
Hats off to the team managing the sale of this archive for getting an article in the Guardian and then here to promoting their work.
By @underlogic - about 2 months
why don't they just scan it and release the images as a public archive? are we arguing over old paper now? what will we do with it in a museum? lock it in a glass case so no oily fingers can turn the pages? maybe scholars want to rub their faces all over the book cover at the weekends as a kink?