August 21st, 2024

Bioaccumulation of Microplastics in Decedent Human Brains

A study found that microplastics accumulate more in human brains than in other organs, with concentrations rising significantly from 2016 to 2024, predominantly consisting of polyethylene, raising health concerns.

Read original articleLink Icon
FearConcernDisbelief
Bioaccumulation of Microplastics in Decedent Human Brains

A study assessed the bioaccumulation of microplastics in human brains using pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). Autopsy samples from decedents in Albuquerque, NM, collected in 2016 and 2024, were analyzed to compare microplastic concentrations in the brain, liver, and kidneys. Results indicated that the brain had significantly higher concentrations of microplastics than the other organs, with levels rising from 3,057 μg/g in 2016 to 4,806 μg/g in 2024. Polyethylene was the most prevalent polymer found, constituting 74% of the brain's microplastic content, compared to 44-57% in liver and kidney samples. The study also noted a general increase in microplastic concentrations across all organs over the years. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed the presence of nanoscale particles, predominantly aged, shard-like plastics. The findings highlight the selective accumulation of microplastics in the human brain and raise concerns about the potential health implications of increasing microplastic exposure.

- Microplastics accumulate more in human brains than in liver or kidney tissues.

- Concentrations of microplastics in the brain increased significantly from 2016 to 2024.

- Polyethylene was the dominant polymer found in brain samples.

- The study utilized advanced Py-GC/MS techniques for accurate quantification of microplastics.

- The presence of nanoscale microplastics in human tissues raises health concerns.

Related

Plastic particles in bottled water

Plastic particles in bottled water

Researchers at Columbia University developed an imaging technique to detect nanoplastics in bottled water. A liter contains 240,000 plastic pieces, 90% being nanoplastics like polyamide and PET. The method, using SRS microscopy, aids in studying human exposure to nanoplastics and analyzing environmental samples.

Curb 'stupid plastics' and stop industry BS: urgent actions to prevent a crisis

Curb 'stupid plastics' and stop industry BS: urgent actions to prevent a crisis

Plastic pollution threatens human health with microplastics detected in tissues. Costs exceed $675 billion in the US. Urgent global actions like capping production, regulating chemicals, and promoting reuse are crucial.

Toxic Compounds in Everyday Products Are Disrupting Vital Human Proteins

Toxic Compounds in Everyday Products Are Disrupting Vital Human Proteins

Researchers at the University of Texas at El Paso found nanoplastics and PFAS can alter proteins crucial for human development, potentially causing health issues. The study emphasizes the need for safer materials and informs environmental policies.

There's a Surprisingly Easy Way to Remove Microplastics from Your Drinking Water

There's a Surprisingly Easy Way to Remove Microplastics from Your Drinking Water

Researchers from Guangzhou Medical University and Jinan University found that boiling and filtering tap water can remove up to 90% of microplastics, especially in hard water, promoting health safety.

Microplastics are infiltrating brain tissue, studies show

Microplastics are infiltrating brain tissue, studies show

Recent studies show alarming microplastic levels in human brain tissue, particularly in dementia patients. The EPA is developing guidelines, while global efforts aim for a treaty to combat plastic pollution.

AI: What people are saying
The study on microplastics in human brains has generated significant concern and discussion among commenters.
  • Many commenters express alarm over the increasing concentration of microplastics in the brain, with some citing specific statistics from the study.
  • There is skepticism about the lack of comprehensive research on the health effects of microplastics, with suggestions that the issue is being ignored due to economic interests.
  • Commenters highlight the pervasive nature of microplastics in the environment, questioning how individuals can avoid exposure.
  • Some speculate on potential health implications, including links to chronic diseases and developmental issues like autism.
  • Concerns are raised about the methodology of the study and the implications of the findings, particularly regarding the blood-brain barrier.
Link Icon 21 comments
By @adriand - 8 months
Terrifying study: “total plastics mass concentration in brains increased over 50% in the past 8 years”. Their 2024 brain matter samples are on average 0.48% plastic by weight, if I am reading this correctly: “The brain samples, all derived from the frontal cortex, revealed substantially higher concentrations than liver or kidney, at 3,057 μg/g in 2016 samples and 4,806 μg/g (0.48%, by weight) in 2024 samples, ranging as high as 8,861 μg/g.”

The only good news is that apparently the brain can clear these particles; the problem is that there is a steadily increasing amount of exposure which means that rather than clearance, there is accumulation.

By @Aurornis - 8 months
> The brain samples, all derived from the frontal cortex, revealed substantially higher concentrations than liver or kidney, at 3,057 μg/g in 2016 samples and 4,806 μg/g (0.48%, by weight) in 2024 samples, ranging as high as 8,861 μg/g.

Brains were 0.5% plastic by weight? The highest value was nearly 1% plastic.

That seems hard to believe.

By @sickblastoise - 8 months
We’ve really screwed the pooch on this one. How many cancers, chronic diseases, birth defects, are a result of our mass pollution of this once pristine oasis of life, the only one we have?
By @makotech221 - 8 months
Very amusing that after decades of warnings about microplastics, there haven't been any studies to move beyond the point of 'maybe they cause issues'. We can all only assume that they do, of course, because any normal society not entirely captured by capital would allocate money to research this topic thoroughly. The fact that we haven't means that they know it causes issues but it would be costly to do cleanup.
By @perching_aix - 8 months
> The ubiquitous presence of plastics, especially polymer-derived particulates ranging from 500 micrometers in diameter down to 1 nanometer, defined as micro- and nanoplastics (MNP)

Aren't plastics by design long chains of molecules? 1 nm is like a handful of atoms at most afaik. How small do plastics get?

By @kragen - 8 months
> Formalin-fixed tissue samples (approximately 500mg) were digested with 10% potassium hydroxide for 3d at 40°C with intermittent manual mixing to ensure even and thorough digestion.

"you think your job is bad, kaitlyn? get a load of what dr. campen's got me doing this week!"

By @true_blue - 8 months
The scariest part for me is that there's essentially no escape from microplastics. If it turns out that they're greatly harmful, what can you really do?
By @formvoltron - 8 months
what boggles the mind is that there doesn't seem to be any way to avoid absorbing this stuff. it's in the food, the air, the water. even if you try to filter the air or filter your water.. the filters are made from plastic!
By @in_vestor - 8 months
The paper shows 2024 brains are worse than 2016 brains. Why? It’s not that long, and it’s not like the decade prior to 2016 had less plastics.
By @Sephr - 8 months
> total plastics mass concentration in brains increased over 50% in the past 8 years

I wonder if this correlates with the rise in the use of 'compostable' (i.e. weaker) plastics, that are more likely to break down during use.

By @samplatt - 8 months
>The mean (and standard deviation) age of 2016 decedents was 50.0 (±11.4) years and 52.3 (±16.8) years for the 2024 decedents.

27 organ material samples from 2016 and 24 samples from 2024 - but they don't say if they're from different people. I assume they are but it's not stated.

Just wondering how much the increased age would have contributed to differences between the two years.

By @tim333 - 8 months
I'm curious how they get in there. In food, through the gut then to the blood, then the organs? Or do we breathe them?
By @dukeofdoom - 8 months
This could be what caused the rise in Autism in Children. On the other hand, having grown up in a world where glass was used for everything. Cutting yourself on shard of glass from a glass bottle in the grass or alleyway was pretty common. Sometimes deadly when it cut a child's vain.
By @giantg2 - 8 months
I thought it was difficult for many things to pass through the blood brain barrier. How are these particles making it through?
By @Gin1982 - 8 months
Am I the only person that is skeptical about this papers findings? 0.5% just seems implausible to me. The study is preprint (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100893/) and it states that "The present data are derived from novel analytical chemistry methods that have yet to be widely adopted and refined" - "pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry".

This different paper talks about this approach and its limitations: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8929/1/2/16

"Prior to Pyr-GC/MS analysis, environmental samples undergo purification steps to isolate MP from the environmental matrix. However, this purification is not complete, and several organic and mineral constituents survive these treatment steps, especially in complex matrices such as sediments or soils. Hurley et al. [15] reported that the efficiency of removing organic matter from soil varied from 34% to 108% depending on the used reagent (H2O2, Fenton’s reagent, NaOH, KOH). These remaining particles will hamper the characterization and quantification of MP particles through Pyr-GC/MS. Upon thermal cracking, the polymers release pyrolysis products of lower molecular weight. Some of these products are defined as indicator compounds when they allow the detection of targeted polymers. However, some constituents of the remaining natural organic matter may release the same pyrolysis products as the targeted polymers [15,16,17,18], hence a potential MP overestimation. The identification of pyrolysis products that are specific to the targeted polymers is therefore necessary."

Sounds like the detection methods and methodology for microplastics are evolving. It is plausible that the amounts are materially over estimated.

Another thing that seems implausible is the increase between 2016 and 2024? "our finding that total plastics mass concentration in brains increased over 50% in the past 8 years.". 50% in 8 years! Is the world really that different in terms of plastic exposure 2024 vs. 2016. Unless something has fundamentally changed with the food supply in this period how can this be possible? Plastic production is increasing (https://www.statista.com/statistics/282732/global-production...) but for a 50% increase in this period something would have to have fundamentally changed with exposure routes in this period.

By @hammock - 8 months
What is the evidence that Microplastics are harmful?
By @userbinator - 8 months
This is a preprint. It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.