August 27th, 2024

Zuckerberg says the White House pressured Facebook over some Covid-19 content

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg alleged that Biden administration officials pressured Facebook to censor COVID-19 content. He regrets not opposing this pressure and will not fund voter access initiatives amid rising misinformation concerns.

Read original articleLink Icon
Zuckerberg says the White House pressured Facebook over some Covid-19 content

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has claimed that senior officials from the Biden administration pressured Facebook to censor certain COVID-19 content during the pandemic. In a letter to Rep. Jim Jordan, Zuckerberg stated that these officials expressed frustration when Facebook did not comply with requests to remove content, including humor and satire related to the virus. He expressed regret for not being more vocal against this pressure and indicated that the company would resist similar demands in the future. The White House responded by emphasizing the importance of responsible actions to protect public health, asserting that tech companies should consider the impact of their actions on the public while maintaining their independence. Zuckerberg also mentioned that Facebook had implemented measures to label posts with credible information about COVID-19 vaccines and warned users against misinformation. Additionally, he announced that he would not be donating to initiatives aimed at widening voter access in the upcoming election cycle, aiming to maintain neutrality amid accusations of bias. This comes as concerns grow over the potential for misinformation to influence the upcoming U.S. elections, particularly with the rise of artificial intelligence tools that can create misleading content.

- Zuckerberg claims the Biden administration pressured Facebook to censor COVID-19 content.

- The White House emphasized the need for responsible actions to protect public health.

- Zuckerberg regrets not being more outspoken against government pressure.

- He will not donate to initiatives for widening voter access in the upcoming election.

- Concerns about misinformation in the upcoming U.S. elections are increasing.

Related

Zuckerberg disses closed-source AI competitors as trying to 'create God'

Zuckerberg disses closed-source AI competitors as trying to 'create God'

Mark Zuckerberg advocates for open-source AI tools over closed-source competitors focusing on a single AI entity. Meta plans AI Studio tests for Instagram avatars and envisions AI integration in tech products.

Meta says Trump and Biden are subject to the same rules as regular users

Meta says Trump and Biden are subject to the same rules as regular users

Meta announced that Trump and Biden will follow regular user rules on Facebook and Instagram. Critics argue this move could mislead as politicians have special privileges, like spreading misinformation without consequences. Fact-checking political speech is crucial for informing voters and holding politicians accountable.

Elon Musk Shares Manipulated Harris Video, in Seeming Violation of X's Policies

Elon Musk Shares Manipulated Harris Video, in Seeming Violation of X's Policies

Elon Musk shared a manipulated video of Vice President Kamala Harris, raising concerns about misleading content and compliance with X's policies against deceptive media, amid growing worries about deepfake technology's impact on democracy.

Elon Musk Has Turned X into His Personal Political Playground

Elon Musk Has Turned X into His Personal Political Playground

Elon Musk has transformed X into a platform for his political agenda, endorsing Trump and increasing misinformation, while critics highlight a lack of moderation and oversight, raising free speech concerns.

FBI Resumes Communication with Facebook, X and Others on Foreign Disinformation

FBI Resumes Communication with Facebook, X and Others on Foreign Disinformation

The FBI has resumed communication with social media platforms to combat foreign disinformation ahead of the presidential election, while new guidelines limit its ability to pressure these platforms.

Link Icon 13 comments
By @drooopy - 8 months
Has mark zuckerberg ever expressed any regret for the fact that his platforms have played a role in instigating conflict and lethal violence in many different parts of the world over the years or is this his only regret?
By @seydor - 8 months
It looks like there is a come-back of free speech on big tech. Probably because their interests and some government's interests do not align as of lately . Not that I 'm complaining but if this is really a trend, it took way too long to take us back to 2001

Also interesting that the AP article doesn't mention the hunter biden story censorhip that zuck mentions in the same letter.

By @josefritzishere - 8 months
There a retcon in that article. They say Biden and 2020 but Trump was president in 2020. Biden was sworn in January 2021.
By @ChrisArchitect - 8 months
By @rhelz - 8 months
When the plague struck, I was living in NY city, in a large apartment building. *Every* *single* *day* one of my neighbors was wheeled out the front doors, feet-first, never to return.

Then it was *two* neighbors a day...

The hospital beds were filling up so fast, they were building tent hospitals in Central Park. So many bodies were piling up in morgues that there was serious talk about having mass burials.

It is very easy to armchair quarterback how this should have played out--5 years later, with the benefit of hindsight. Yes, lots of things could have been handled better. Yes, we should do postmortems to find out what could be done better next time.

But FFS, both the government and corporate leaders had to make decisions in real time--decisions they knew would have real consequences, and decisions they knew had the possibility of being wrong. They didn't have the luxury of perfection. It was a once-in-a-century pandemic, and they had to act in the face of partial information.

All things considered, they did a pretty good job.

By @Mattasher - 8 months
The use of "some" here in the headline seems dishonest and diminishing of what was done. Like, "some people were effected by the car crash".

Technically true, but effectively more narrative than journalism, especially since among that censored "some" was a lot of true information and experiences.

By @andy_ppp - 8 months
I wonder if this is coming up just before the election because of the Harris campaign’s suggested policy of capital gains tax on unrealised gains for people who have over $100m in assets? I think this is a great idea personally given what these people are doing to avoid paying tax including taking out loans against their own share portfolios.

EDIT: surprisingly aggressive downvoting on this, seems reasonable to make the point that a lot of owners of social media sites have billions of dollars in taxes riding on a Trump win if this policy happens.

By @progrus - 8 months
The long march has stalled, soon the lizards will break ranks and flee.
By @zug_zug - 8 months
Meh, I find this very hard to care about. I suppose to some degree there was some overreaction around covid, but I feel like some portion of the country being actively conspiratorial saps any faith I had that there's some inherent selection algorithm out there in our nature that will elevate rational, calm, evidence-based ideas to the top.
By @taylodl - 8 months
“I believe the government pressure was wrong and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” Zuckerberg wrote

I believe how Zuckerberg handled a pandemic that killed millions of people around the world was wrong. At some point in time, we have to admit to ourselves that misinformation, including misinformation masquerading as "satire", is deadly and we're going to have to come to terms whether spreading deadly misinformation is a constitutionally protected right.