August 27th, 2024

How Chrome Accessibility Works

The document details Chrome's accessibility features, emphasizing platform-specific APIs, the automatic provision of accessibility in standard UI toolkits, and challenges with custom controls and multi-process browser adaptations.

Read original articleLink Icon
How Chrome Accessibility Works

The document outlines the technical aspects of Chrome's accessibility features, detailing how accessibility is integrated into applications and web browsers. It begins by explaining that different platforms have unique accessibility APIs that assistive technologies utilize. When using standard UI toolkits, accessibility is often automatically provided for UI elements. However, developers may need to add specific accessibility properties, such as labels for images or alerts for screen readers. The document also discusses the challenges of creating custom controls, which require subclassing accessibility interfaces to ensure proper representation in accessibility APIs.

For web browsers, the document describes how a single-process browser handles accessibility by creating a corresponding accessible object for each DOM node, allowing for efficient communication with platform accessibility APIs. It highlights the complexities introduced by CSS and ARIA, which can alter the relationship between the DOM and accessibility trees. The document concludes by indicating that the next section will address the adaptations needed for a multi-process browser.

- Chrome's accessibility features rely on platform-specific APIs for assistive technologies.

- Standard UI toolkits often provide built-in accessibility for common UI elements.

- Custom controls require subclassing accessibility interfaces for proper functionality.

- A single-process browser creates accessible objects corresponding to each DOM node.

- CSS and ARIA introduce complexities in the relationship between DOM and accessibility trees.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @mltony - about 2 months
Could you guys fix this accessibility bug: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=126072... - it's been open for years.
By @partiallypro - about 2 months
Slightly unrelated, but there's a whole industry on ADA compliance and randomly trying to sue people over it in the digital space (for website specifically.) Which seems like an issue that could -largely- be solved by the browsers themselves (animation pauses, contrast, font sizes, readable font switching, etc.) There's no telling how much companies spend on services like Accessible or Userway, etc. There's also a new industry on cookie & privacy compliance because of this too. I get privacy and ADA compliance, but some of this is just clearly written by the people making the tools. It's regulatory capture to the fullest extent. I found this out recently with a client wanting to pay through the nose to essentially have a whole separate company paid monthly to make sure the privacy policy and cookie policies meet various state laws. It's a bit ridiculous.
By @vhiremath4 - about 2 months
It seems like small multimodal LLMs have a killer use case to be bundled with browsers for accessibility. Eventually:

* if an image doesn’t have alt text

* you need to be read the page

* you need to be described what’s happening in a video

A model built into the OS or browser seems like a no-brainer.