August 29th, 2024

X caught blocking links to NPR, claiming the news site may be 'unsafe'

X marked NPR links as "unsafe," causing user warnings typically for malicious content. After labeling the warning a "false positive," X's actions raise concerns about censorship and media relations.

Read original articleLink Icon
X caught blocking links to NPR, claiming the news site may be 'unsafe'

X, the social media platform owned by Elon Musk, has been marking links to NPR's website as "unsafe," particularly for a story about an incident involving a Trump campaign staffer and an Arlington National Cemetery employee. Users attempting to access the link received a warning typically reserved for malicious content, which raised concerns about X's intentions regarding the dissemination of news. The warning prompted users to either return to the previous page or ignore the alert to continue to the article. NPR's URL was later changed, but it remains unclear if this was a response to the warning or a separate issue. X later acknowledged the warning as a "false positive" and corrected it. This incident adds to the ongoing tension between NPR and X, as NPR previously distanced itself from the platform after being labeled as "state-affiliated media." The situation has implications for X's reputation as a platform for free speech, potentially driving users to alternative platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky.

- X marked NPR links as "unsafe," raising concerns about censorship.

- Users received warnings typically associated with malicious content.

- NPR's URL change may or may not be related to the warning.

- X later corrected the warning, calling it a "false positive."

- The incident reflects ongoing tensions between NPR and X regarding media labeling.

Link Icon 9 comments
By @outlace - 8 months
Summary of article: A single NPR link got automatically flagged by X to display a warning after NPR changed the URL for an unknown reason. It was reported to X who said it was a false positive and corrected it.
By @daghamm - 8 months
And you know why this crap will continue?

Because you guys will go on twitter to discuss this.

By @r721 - 8 months
Back in 2023:

>t.co is adding a five-second delay to some domains

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37130060

By @focusedone - 8 months
I miss the old, funky Twitter. Back before the platform itself was actively trying to push people away from it.

My Mastodon feed keeps improving. Maybe someday it'll get there.

By @snarkyturtle - 8 months
I like NPR but I wonder why their slugs have that weird bit of code after the date/time

"nx-s1-5092087" looks like a random string that might trigger some automated firewalls or checks

By @theanonymousone - 8 months
Can someone explain to an outsider how "state funded" NPR is, if at all? Is it like BBC, DW, .. or more like CNN/FoxNews? And does its political stance change between governments?
By @josefritzishere - 8 months
I deleted my Twitter account overa year ago. I was not liking the changes. Stories like this only confirm my decison to be right.
By @blackeyeblitzar - 8 months
The title is misleading. X isn’t blocking NPR, but was displaying a warning about a potentially unsafe link on one article from NPR. I don’t see any evidence that there is something malicious here; it could just be some automation acting incorrectly. NPR did change the URL and title of the article, by the way, and I wonder if that triggered something.

All that said, I am against any type of link blocking or warning functionality in the first place. This type of message is at best patronizing and at worst, censorship. Reddit does this, blocking links to various domains entirely or shadow banning submissions or comments with those links. I have seen their automation do this even in more nuanced ways, for example blocking certain Wikipedia links to articles that they’ve deemed unacceptable, instead of the whole domain. Other social media - including Twitter pre-acquisition, Meta, etc - all variously show such warnings from time to time or block certain domains entirely, both in submissions/posts and comments.

In my experience, the blocking on those platforms (not warnings but outright blocks) has had a political bias towards the left and against moderate or right wing views across these platforms. I find it hypocritical that people who have supported over the top censorship for years are now so offended and upset when it happens on Twitter/X, even if it is accidental and not malicious. Regardless, I think Twitter/X does owe an explanation in such situations and should act quickly to correct it.