You've only added two lines – why did that take two days
The article highlights that in software development, the number of lines of code does not reflect effort. Effective bug fixing requires thorough investigation, understanding context, and proper testing to prevent recurring issues.
Read original articleThe article discusses the complexities involved in software development, particularly when addressing bugs. It challenges the common misconception that the number of lines of code added directly correlates to the effort or value of the work done. The author explains that a seemingly simple fix can take considerable time due to various factors, such as the vague nature of the bug report, unfamiliarity with the specific functionality, and the need for thorough investigation to identify the root cause rather than just addressing symptoms. The author emphasizes the importance of understanding the code's context, verifying potential impacts on other areas, and ensuring that the fix is robust and well-tested to prevent future issues. The piece highlights the value of taking the time to do a job correctly, rather than rushing to meet superficial metrics, and underscores the frustration of repeatedly fixing the same bug.
- The number of lines of code does not equate to effort or value in software development.
- Thorough investigation and understanding of the code are crucial for effective bug fixing.
- Addressing the root cause of a problem is more important than simply suppressing errors.
- Proper testing and verification are essential to prevent future issues.
- Rushing fixes can lead to repeated problems and increased frustration for developers.
Related
Getting 100% code coverage doesn't eliminate bugs
Achieving 100% code coverage doesn't ensure bug-free software. A blog post illustrates this with a critical bug missed despite full coverage, leading to a rocket explosion. It suggests alternative approaches and a 20% coverage minimum.
Whose bug is this anyway?? (2012)
Patrick Wyatt shares bug experiences from game development, including issues in StarCraft and Guild Wars. Compiler problems caused bugs, emphasizing the need for consistent tools and work-life balance in development.
Projects considered harmful – Part 1
Software development projects often prioritize time and budget over quality, leading to compromised dependability. Project managers focus on meeting objectives, neglecting software quality. Reevaluating project management practices is crucial for software dependability.
Fear of over-engineering has killed engineering altogether
The article critiques the tech industry's focus on speed over engineering rigor, advocating for "Napkin Math" and Fermi problems to improve decision-making and project outcomes through basic calculations.
Algorithms We Develop Software By
The article explores software development methodologies that improve coding efficiency, emphasizing daily feature work, code rewriting, the "gun to the head" heuristic, and effective navigation of problem spaces.
Related
Getting 100% code coverage doesn't eliminate bugs
Achieving 100% code coverage doesn't ensure bug-free software. A blog post illustrates this with a critical bug missed despite full coverage, leading to a rocket explosion. It suggests alternative approaches and a 20% coverage minimum.
Whose bug is this anyway?? (2012)
Patrick Wyatt shares bug experiences from game development, including issues in StarCraft and Guild Wars. Compiler problems caused bugs, emphasizing the need for consistent tools and work-life balance in development.
Projects considered harmful – Part 1
Software development projects often prioritize time and budget over quality, leading to compromised dependability. Project managers focus on meeting objectives, neglecting software quality. Reevaluating project management practices is crucial for software dependability.
Fear of over-engineering has killed engineering altogether
The article critiques the tech industry's focus on speed over engineering rigor, advocating for "Napkin Math" and Fermi problems to improve decision-making and project outcomes through basic calculations.
Algorithms We Develop Software By
The article explores software development methodologies that improve coding efficiency, emphasizing daily feature work, code rewriting, the "gun to the head" heuristic, and effective navigation of problem spaces.