AI Has Created a Battle over Web Crawling
The rise of generative AI has prompted websites to restrict data access via robots.txt, leading to concerns over declining training data quality and potential impacts on AI model performance.
Read original articleThe rise of generative AI has led to a significant shift in how websites manage their data, particularly through the use of the robots.txt protocol, which restricts web crawlers from accessing certain content. As AI companies rely heavily on vast datasets sourced from the web, many organizations are increasingly concerned about their data being used without consent, prompting them to implement these restrictions. A report from the Data Provenance Initiative highlights that a growing number of high-quality websites are blocking crawlers, which could lead to a decline in the quality of training data available for AI models. The report indicates that from 2023 to 2024, there has been a notable increase in domains restricting access, with 25% of data from the top 2,000 websites in a popular dataset being revoked. This trend raises concerns about the future performance of AI models, as they may rely more on lower-quality data from personal blogs and e-commerce sites. The situation is further complicated by the legal ambiguities surrounding robots.txt, which is not legally enforceable, and the ongoing debates about data usage rights. As a result, AI companies may need to explore alternative data acquisition strategies, including licensing data directly or investing in synthetic data, to maintain the quality and relevance of their training datasets.
- Websites are increasingly using robots.txt to restrict access to their data for AI crawlers.
- A significant portion of high-quality data is being revoked, impacting the training of generative AI models.
- Legal ambiguities exist around the enforceability of robots.txt restrictions.
- AI companies may need to license data or rely on synthetic data to continue model training.
- The shift in data availability could lead to a decline in the performance of future AI models.
Related
OpenAI and Anthropic are ignoring robots.txt
Two AI startups, OpenAI and Anthropic, are reported to be disregarding robots.txt rules, allowing them to scrape web content despite claiming to respect such regulations. TollBit analytics revealed this behavior, raising concerns about data misuse.
We need an evolved robots.txt and regulations to enforce it
In the era of AI, the robots.txt file faces limitations in guiding web crawlers. Proposals advocate for enhanced standards to regulate content indexing, caching, and language model training. Stricter enforcement, including penalties for violators like Perplexity AI, is urged to protect content creators and uphold ethical AI practices.
The Data That Powers A.I. Is Disappearing Fast
A study highlights a decline in available data for training A.I. models due to restrictions from web sources, affecting A.I. developers and companies like OpenAI, Google, and Meta. Challenges prompt exploration of new data access tools and alternative training methods.
NYT: The Data That Powers AI Is Disappearing Fast
A study highlights a decline in available data for training A.I. models due to restrictions from web sources, affecting A.I. developers and researchers. Companies explore partnerships and new tools amid data challenges.
AI crawlers need to be more respectful
Read the Docs has reported increased abusive AI crawling, leading to high bandwidth costs. They are blocking offenders and urging AI companies to adopt respectful practices and improve crawler efficiency.
I have never done anything serious, but have always tried to keep my hit rate fairly modest.
I'm also concerned that Free and open APIs might become a thing of the past as more "AI-driven" web scrapers/crawlers begin to overwhelm them.
Or a list of IP addresses or user agents or other identifying info known to be used by AI crawlers?
Ultimately pointless but just curious.
I welcome all useragents and have been delighted to see openai, anthropic, microsoft, and other AI related crawlers mirroring my public website(s). Just the same as when I see googlebot or bingbot or firefox using humans. For information that I don't want to be public I simply don't put it on public websites.
Considering my blog's niche focus on A/V production with Linux, I can only imagine how much more frequent their crawling would be on more popular websites.
Screw that. Research is about ethical consent. Also this is very much "well everyone should let me (a researcher) access whatever I like"
Related
OpenAI and Anthropic are ignoring robots.txt
Two AI startups, OpenAI and Anthropic, are reported to be disregarding robots.txt rules, allowing them to scrape web content despite claiming to respect such regulations. TollBit analytics revealed this behavior, raising concerns about data misuse.
We need an evolved robots.txt and regulations to enforce it
In the era of AI, the robots.txt file faces limitations in guiding web crawlers. Proposals advocate for enhanced standards to regulate content indexing, caching, and language model training. Stricter enforcement, including penalties for violators like Perplexity AI, is urged to protect content creators and uphold ethical AI practices.
The Data That Powers A.I. Is Disappearing Fast
A study highlights a decline in available data for training A.I. models due to restrictions from web sources, affecting A.I. developers and companies like OpenAI, Google, and Meta. Challenges prompt exploration of new data access tools and alternative training methods.
NYT: The Data That Powers AI Is Disappearing Fast
A study highlights a decline in available data for training A.I. models due to restrictions from web sources, affecting A.I. developers and researchers. Companies explore partnerships and new tools amid data challenges.
AI crawlers need to be more respectful
Read the Docs has reported increased abusive AI crawling, leading to high bandwidth costs. They are blocking offenders and urging AI companies to adopt respectful practices and improve crawler efficiency.