September 5th, 2024

Rust for Linux Revisited

Drew DeVault reflects on the Rust-for-Linux project's challenges, suggesting a new Rust-compatible kernel could alleviate political hurdles and developer burnout, while attracting contributors and expediting development.

Read original articleLink Icon
Rust for Linux Revisited

Drew DeVault revisits the Rust-for-Linux project, reflecting on its progress and challenges over the past two years. Initially skeptical about Rust's integration into the Linux kernel, DeVault acknowledges the dedication and talent of the developers involved. However, he highlights the significant political hurdles within the Linux community, where introducing Rust has led to burnout among contributors. The complexity of achieving consensus among over 1,700 maintainers complicates the integration process, making it more about navigating politics than coding. DeVault suggests that instead of continuing to push for Rust's inclusion in the Linux kernel, developers might consider creating a new Linux-compatible kernel from scratch using Rust. This approach could allow for quicker progress without the political entanglements of the Linux Kernel Mailing List (LKML). He emphasizes that a focused project with a clear goal could attract contributors and facilitate the development of a Rust-based operating system. DeVault also addresses concerns about driver support, suggesting that careful selection of use cases could mitigate these issues. He concludes by encouraging Rust-for-Linux participants to consider this alternative path as a potential recovery project from burnout.

- The Rust-for-Linux project faces significant political challenges within the Linux community.

- Developer burnout is a prevalent issue due to the complexities of achieving consensus.

- DeVault proposes creating a new Linux-compatible kernel in Rust as an alternative.

- A focused project could attract contributors and expedite development.

- Careful selection of use cases can address potential driver support concerns.

Link Icon 0 comments