You Do Have Some Expectation of Privacy in Public
The EFF asserts that individuals in the U.S. have a reasonable expectation of privacy in public, emphasizing the need for warrants for accessing sensitive tracking data amid advancing surveillance technologies.
Read original article
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) emphasizes that individuals in the United States maintain a reasonable expectation of privacy even in public spaces, countering the common belief that public visibility equates to a loss of privacy rights. The rise of advanced surveillance technologies, such as Automated License Plate Readers and extensive public and private camera networks, has transformed the nature of public observation. While people can be seen in public, the aggregation of data collected over time can reveal intimate details about their lives, which raises significant privacy concerns. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Carpenter v. United States established that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding their physical movements, including those in public, and that law enforcement typically requires a warrant to access such data. The EFF argues that this principle should extend to other surveillance technologies, asserting that tracking an individual's movements over time is sensitive and revealing. The organization calls for continued vigilance in protecting privacy rights, as the legal landscape struggles to keep pace with technological advancements.
- Individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in public spaces.
- Advanced surveillance technologies can collect sensitive data about individuals' movements.
- The Supreme Court's Carpenter decision reinforces privacy rights regarding location data.
- Law enforcement generally needs a warrant to access detailed tracking information.
- Ongoing advocacy is necessary to protect privacy rights in the face of evolving surveillance practices.
Related
Why privacy is important, and having "nothing to hide" is irrelevant (2016)
Privacy is crucial for democracy, eroded by global surveillance. "Nothing to hide" argument debunked. Mass surveillance harms freedom, leads to self-censorship, and risks misuse. Protecting personal data is vital.
No reasonable expectation of privacy in one's Google location data
The Fourth Circuit Court ruled users lack privacy expectations in Google location data. Google offers control over data, including location history stored in Sensorvault. Geofence warrants addressed, requiring law enforcement to follow specific procedures. Court found geofencing compliant with the Fourth Amendment, sparking debates on tech-law enforcement balance.
Federal Appeals Court Finds Geofence Warrants Are Categorically Unconstitutional
The Fifth Circuit Court ruled geofence warrants unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, emphasizing the need for specific targeting in searches to protect individual privacy rights and referencing the Carpenter ruling.
EFF Presses Federal Circuit to Make Patent Case Filings Public
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is appealing a Texas court's decision allowing excessive sealing of patent case documents, raising concerns about transparency and public access to judicial records.
The Feds Are Skirting the 4th Amendment by Buying Data from Tech Companies
Government agencies are increasingly purchasing private data, including geolocation information, to conduct surveillance without warrants, raising significant privacy concerns about circumventing Fourth Amendment protections.
1 commentsRelated
Why privacy is important, and having "nothing to hide" is irrelevant (2016)
Privacy is crucial for democracy, eroded by global surveillance. "Nothing to hide" argument debunked. Mass surveillance harms freedom, leads to self-censorship, and risks misuse. Protecting personal data is vital.
No reasonable expectation of privacy in one's Google location data
The Fourth Circuit Court ruled users lack privacy expectations in Google location data. Google offers control over data, including location history stored in Sensorvault. Geofence warrants addressed, requiring law enforcement to follow specific procedures. Court found geofencing compliant with the Fourth Amendment, sparking debates on tech-law enforcement balance.
Federal Appeals Court Finds Geofence Warrants Are Categorically Unconstitutional
The Fifth Circuit Court ruled geofence warrants unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, emphasizing the need for specific targeting in searches to protect individual privacy rights and referencing the Carpenter ruling.
EFF Presses Federal Circuit to Make Patent Case Filings Public
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is appealing a Texas court's decision allowing excessive sealing of patent case documents, raising concerns about transparency and public access to judicial records.
The Feds Are Skirting the 4th Amendment by Buying Data from Tech Companies
Government agencies are increasingly purchasing private data, including geolocation information, to conduct surveillance without warrants, raising significant privacy concerns about circumventing Fourth Amendment protections.