Two Students Built an A-Bomb (2003)
In the 1960s, the Nth Country Project assessed if non-experts could design a nuclear bomb. Participants Dobson and Selden created a viable design, raising concerns about nuclear proliferation and accessibility.
Read original articleIn the 1960s, two students, Dave Dobson and Bob Selden, participated in a covert Pentagon initiative called the Nth Country Project, aimed at determining whether non-experts could design a nuclear bomb. The project emerged in the context of rising fears of nuclear proliferation following the Cuban missile crisis. Despite lacking nuclear expertise, both men, equipped only with physics knowledge, were tasked with creating a bomb design without access to classified information. They worked under strict conditions at the Livermore Radiation Laboratory, where they had to submit their designs for testing without knowing if they were being evaluated against real-world standards. Ultimately, they produced a detailed document outlining a bomb design that could theoretically be constructed. Their findings revealed that, while obtaining fissile material is a significant challenge, the actual design of a nuclear weapon was not overwhelmingly difficult. This realization left both men troubled about the implications of their work, particularly in light of contemporary threats from terrorist organizations. Dobson chose to leave the field of nuclear research, while Selden continued to engage with military research and policy. Their experiences underscore the ongoing concerns about nuclear proliferation and the accessibility of nuclear weapon design knowledge.
- The Nth Country Project aimed to assess if non-experts could design a nuclear bomb.
- Dobson and Selden produced a viable bomb design without classified information.
- The project highlighted the ease of designing a nuclear weapon compared to obtaining fissile material.
- Both participants were left troubled by the implications of their findings on nuclear proliferation.
- The project remains relevant amid contemporary concerns about nuclear threats from rogue states and terrorist groups.
Related
We're building thermonuclear spaceships again–this time for real
The military and NASA are working on nuclear thermal rockets (NTRs) for space exploration. NTRs use liquid hydrogen and nuclear reactors for efficient thrust. Originating in the 1950s, challenges include fuel rod durability and hydrogen's corrosiveness.
We're building nuclear spaceships again–this time for real
The U.S. military and NASA are reviving nuclear thermal rocket development for space exploration, focusing on demonstration hardware to improve fuel efficiency and overcome technical challenges for future missions.
Was the Internet created to survive a nuclear strike?
The belief that the Internet was designed to survive a nuclear attack is a myth; ARPANET was created for academic communication, not military purposes, despite later misconceptions linking it to Cold War fears.
Britain's nuclear submarine software built by Belarusian engineers
Britain's nuclear submarine software was developed with foreign contributions, violating MoD rules. An investigation revealed attempts to conceal this involvement, raising security concerns about potential risks and vulnerabilities in defense supply chains.
Did Sandia use a thermonuclear secondary in a product logo?
Alex Wellerstein analyzed a 2007 graphic from Sandia National Laboratories resembling a thermonuclear weapon, raising concerns about classification oversight and its appropriateness in public materials for the SIERRA software framework.
In the mid 1960's, America's nuclear bomb program hired two young physics PhD's, who had zero-ish nuclear weapon knowledge. Their job - sit in an office, and try to design a working A-bomb - based on (1) public knowledge, (2) nuclear experiments that a 4th-rate nation could have performed at the time, and (3) the assumption that said 4th-rate nation had gotten its hands on a modest supply of weapons-grade plutonium.
Strategic Objective: Determine whether or not the only real barrier between troublesome 4th-rate nations and Nuclear Power status was access to weapons-grade not-yet-glowing stuff.
Test Result: SH*T. Said access was definitely the only barrier. So we better ramp up Major Efforts to limit such access...
Related
We're building thermonuclear spaceships again–this time for real
The military and NASA are working on nuclear thermal rockets (NTRs) for space exploration. NTRs use liquid hydrogen and nuclear reactors for efficient thrust. Originating in the 1950s, challenges include fuel rod durability and hydrogen's corrosiveness.
We're building nuclear spaceships again–this time for real
The U.S. military and NASA are reviving nuclear thermal rocket development for space exploration, focusing on demonstration hardware to improve fuel efficiency and overcome technical challenges for future missions.
Was the Internet created to survive a nuclear strike?
The belief that the Internet was designed to survive a nuclear attack is a myth; ARPANET was created for academic communication, not military purposes, despite later misconceptions linking it to Cold War fears.
Britain's nuclear submarine software built by Belarusian engineers
Britain's nuclear submarine software was developed with foreign contributions, violating MoD rules. An investigation revealed attempts to conceal this involvement, raising security concerns about potential risks and vulnerabilities in defense supply chains.
Did Sandia use a thermonuclear secondary in a product logo?
Alex Wellerstein analyzed a 2007 graphic from Sandia National Laboratories resembling a thermonuclear weapon, raising concerns about classification oversight and its appropriateness in public materials for the SIERRA software framework.