September 7th, 2024

'Flight shame is dead': concern grows over climate impact of tourism boom

Post-COVID travel has raised environmental concerns as air traffic rebounds. The tourism sector contributes 8% of global emissions, with proposed solutions like aviation taxes gaining public support for accountability.

Read original articleLink Icon
'Flight shame is dead': concern grows over climate impact of tourism boom

The surge in post-COVID travel has raised significant concerns regarding the environmental impact of tourism, particularly as passenger traffic at European airports has returned to pre-pandemic levels. Experts warn that the tourism sector, responsible for approximately 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions, is likely to see its carbon footprint increase as more regions achieve wealth comparable to Europe and North America. The primary source of emissions, air travel, poses challenges for decarbonization, with alternatives like electric planes and synthetic fuels still in developmental stages. While the tourism industry has begun to address some environmental issues through initiatives like solar panels and plant-based menus, the overall demand for air travel remains high. The concept of "flight shame," popularized by climate activist Greta Thunberg, has not significantly deterred travel, as evidenced by the rebound in air traffic. Critics argue that the industry's focus on the economic benefits of tourism often overshadows its environmental costs. Proposed solutions include implementing a global aviation tax and frequent flyer levies targeting the wealthiest travelers, which could fund climate recovery efforts in poorer nations. Public sentiment appears to support measures that hold airlines accountable for their environmental impact, while many Europeans believe that enjoyable vacations can be achieved without flying.

- Post-COVID travel has led to increased environmental concerns due to rising air traffic.

- The tourism sector contributes about 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions, primarily from air travel.

- "Flight shame" has not significantly reduced travel demand, despite growing awareness of climate issues.

- Proposed solutions include aviation taxes and frequent flyer levies targeting wealthier individuals.

- Public support exists for policies that hold airlines accountable for their environmental impact.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @wryoak - 7 months
I would love to take trains or boats over planes but I’m just not wealthy enough. At least in North America and East Asia, the costs of these modes (sometimes flat out, but always when factoring in the resultant costs of room and board and such from the extended travel time) exceeds any flight. I was looking at getting from the west coast to the Midwest recently and the Amtrak ticket was similar to the flight ticket (or $800 more for an bed) and the travel time was four times as long. Would have needed to budget out five meals minimum, and that’s probably an underestimate given how bad delays are on the Empire builder line when running through oil country. Hell, even the Shinkansen crisscrossing Japan, regularly held up as a model of efficient long distance transit, is more expensive than a flight if you’re not traveling short notice. Better views than from the plane tho