What is the best pointer tagging method?
The article analyzes pointer tagging methods for optimizing memory and performance, noting that practical performance varies by architecture, compiler optimizations are crucial, and untagged pointers often outperform tagged ones.
Read original article
The article discusses various pointer tagging methods, which encode metadata into pointers to optimize memory usage and performance in programming languages. It examines five types of tagged pointers: lower bits, lower byte, upper byte, upper bits, and nan boxing, each utilizing different bits of the pointer for tagging. The benchmarks conducted on an ARM M1 MacBook reveal that while all methods perform similarly in theory, practical performance varies based on the instruction set architecture (ISA). For instance, lower byte tagging excels on x86 due to direct access to low bytes, while alignment bit tagging shows superior performance in certain scenarios. The article also highlights the importance of compiler optimizations, noting that different compilers may yield varying results for the same tagging method. Additionally, it emphasizes that while tagged pointers can be efficient, untagged pointers generally outperform them, especially in function calls. The author concludes that memory access patterns, particularly cache efficiency, are more critical to performance than the choice of pointer tagging method. Thus, optimizing for cache usage and minimizing pointer chasing is more beneficial than focusing solely on instruction-level optimizations.
- Pointer tagging encodes metadata into pointers to optimize memory and performance.
- Performance of tagging methods varies significantly based on the instruction set architecture.
- Compiler optimizations can greatly influence the efficiency of different tagging schemes.
- Untagged pointers generally perform better than tagged ones, especially in function calls.
- Memory access patterns and cache efficiency are more critical to performance than tagging method choice.
Related
Some Tricks from the Scrapscript Compiler
The Scrapscript compiler implements optimization tricks like immediate objects, small strings, and variants for better performance. It introduces immediate variants and const heap to enhance efficiency without complexity, seeking suggestions for future improvements.
Clang vs. Clang
The blog post critiques compiler optimizations in Clang, arguing they often introduce bugs and security vulnerabilities, diminish performance gains, and create timing channels, urging a reevaluation of current practices.
Optimisation-dependent IR decisions in Clang
Clang's Intermediate Representation varies with optimization levels; disabling optimization adds debugging aids, while enabling it introduces performance enhancements like lifetime markers and TBAA metadata, impacting compiler usage and performance tuning.
Parsing protobuf at 2+GB/s: how I learned to love tail calls in C (2021)
The Clang compiler's `musttail` attribute ensures tail call optimization, enhancing performance in C-based interpreters and parsers, particularly improving Protocol Buffers parsing speed to over 2GB/s.
What is the best pointer tagging method?
Pointer tagging methods show varying performance based on architecture and use case, with nan boxing being efficient for floating-point languages. Overall performance is more influenced by memory access patterns and cache efficiency.
0 commentsRelated
Some Tricks from the Scrapscript Compiler
The Scrapscript compiler implements optimization tricks like immediate objects, small strings, and variants for better performance. It introduces immediate variants and const heap to enhance efficiency without complexity, seeking suggestions for future improvements.
Clang vs. Clang
The blog post critiques compiler optimizations in Clang, arguing they often introduce bugs and security vulnerabilities, diminish performance gains, and create timing channels, urging a reevaluation of current practices.
Optimisation-dependent IR decisions in Clang
Clang's Intermediate Representation varies with optimization levels; disabling optimization adds debugging aids, while enabling it introduces performance enhancements like lifetime markers and TBAA metadata, impacting compiler usage and performance tuning.
Parsing protobuf at 2+GB/s: how I learned to love tail calls in C (2021)
The Clang compiler's `musttail` attribute ensures tail call optimization, enhancing performance in C-based interpreters and parsers, particularly improving Protocol Buffers parsing speed to over 2GB/s.
What is the best pointer tagging method?
Pointer tagging methods show varying performance based on architecture and use case, with nan boxing being efficient for floating-point languages. Overall performance is more influenced by memory access patterns and cache efficiency.