Don't buy DRM-infected products, they aren't fit for purpose

Cory Doctorow's latest commentary reflects on the historical acceptance of harmful practices, using the example of radium suppositories to illustrate how society often clings to dangerous ideas despite overwhelming evidence against them. He argues that just as the consensus eventually shifted to recognize the dangers of radium, similar shifts are needed in contemporary discussions about technology and consumer products, particularly regarding Digital Rights Management (DRM). Doctorow emphasizes that the correct response to many modern issues, such as the use of DRM in consumer electronics or the ethics of corporate influence in government, is to reject them entirely rather than seek moderation. He critiques the reluctance of institutions to advocate for complete bans on harmful practices, suggesting that sometimes the most reasonable stance is to declare that certain products or practices should not exist at all. This perspective extends to various sectors, including consumer privacy, where he calls for the elimination of data brokerage. Doctorow concludes that a more assertive approach is necessary to combat the pervasive influence of corporate interests in everyday life, advocating for a zero-tolerance policy on practices that compromise individual rights and safety.

- Doctorow uses radium suppositories as a metaphor for harmful practices that society clings to.

- He advocates for outright rejection of products with DRM and other harmful technologies.

- The commentary highlights the need for stronger consumer privacy protections.

- Doctorow calls for a zero-tolerance approach to corporate influence in government.

- He emphasizes that sometimes the best advice is to not engage with harmful products or practices at all.