Guiding principles: How US dietary guidelines contribute to obesity
The U.S. Dietary Guidelines are criticized for contributing to obesity, promoting high carbohydrate intake, and lacking scientific rigor. Reforms in the upcoming farm bill may improve nutrition policy and health outcomes.
Read original articleThe U.S. Dietary Guidelines, updated every five years by the Departments of Health and Human Services and Agriculture, are criticized for contributing to the obesity epidemic in America. Former members of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee argue that these guidelines, which influence school lunches and medical dietary advice, are based on outdated science and lack transparency. Currently, over 70% of American adults and 20% of children are overweight or obese, with higher rates in low-income families. The guidelines have historically promoted high carbohydrate intake while demonizing saturated fats, leading to increased consumption of processed foods and refined grains. Despite recommendations from the National Academies of Sciences to improve the guidelines' scientific rigor, the USDA has not implemented any changes. The upcoming farm bill presents an opportunity to reform the guideline development process by enforcing evidence-based review methods and disclosing conflicts of interest among committee members. This could restore scientific integrity to national nutrition policy and help combat the rising rates of chronic diseases linked to poor dietary habits.
- The U.S. Dietary Guidelines are linked to rising obesity rates and chronic diseases.
- Current guidelines promote high carbohydrate intake and discourage saturated fats.
- Over 70% of adults and 20% of children in the U.S. are overweight or obese.
- The USDA has not implemented recommended improvements to the guidelines' development process.
- The upcoming farm bill could introduce necessary reforms for better nutrition policy.
Related
Ultra-processed foods need tobacco-style warnings, says scientist
A scientist proposes tobacco-style warnings on ultra-processed foods (UPFs) due to health risks. UPFs displace healthier options, fuel obesity, and chronic diseases. Calls for public health campaigns, restrictions, taxation, and debate on UPFs' impact and regulation.
Food as You Know It Is About to Change
The modern food system faces a "food polycrisis" with rising hunger rates, increased food prices, and climate change impacting agricultural productivity. Urgent changes in practices and diets are necessary for future food security.
We might never know the truth about ultra-processed foods
Ultra-processed foods make up 56% of calorie intake in the UK, especially among children and low-income groups. Their health risks are debated, with calls for more research on their effects.
Why, Are Ultraprocessed Foods So Hard to Resist?
A NIH study is investigating the health impacts of ultraprocessed foods on 36 participants, aiming to understand their appeal and effects on weight gain and health by late 2025.
The Guardian view on meat: we need to eat less of it
The Guardian editorial urges reduced meat consumption due to health risks and environmental impact, highlighting a study linking meat to diabetes and advocating for clearer government guidelines and dietary shifts.
There's way more to the story than dietary guidelines, and there isn't complete consensus on what caused the onset of the obesity epidemic, but the dietary guidelines are at the very least an embarrassing artifact of the problem.
I'm skeptical of any article that tries to pin American health problems on carbohydrates that does not at least mention Japan and try to explain why Japan was fine with a much higher percentage of carbohydrates than Americans eat.
Clearly humans can in fact do fine on a very high carbohydrate diet, so if carbohydrates are a problem in America it has to be something about the particular kinds of carbohydrates we use or how we process or prepare them, not the mere fact that we use a lot of them.
[1] https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-n...
> Chronic high carbohydrate consumption — especially of refined grains and added sugars — drives obesity, diabetes, heart disease and other metabolic disorders
Also, the article mentions saturated fats are over vilified.
Today I learned that 70% of Americans are obese. Never been to america but I'm truly baffled how people and the government could let this happen.
I know that in America the government is supposed not to interfere with people choice but here it's not just some people being lazy and camping at McDonald's.
It gets people into moods, the blood sugar levels and the stress hormone levels. Makes it easier to sell your product and your story. More stress at work, at school and then at home. Less peace equals striving for compensation and submitting yourself to something that gives you that compensation. It's a brutal story.
A tiny deviation from baseline levels is enough and that's exactly what the dietary guidelines resulted in. It was an "unintended" side effect for some time. Then there were patterns.
The guidelines don’t say you should eat sugar and refined grains. They say, if you eat them, you should really limit them to 10% of calories and half your grains at most.
They also don’t say to “fear fat”; that’s just completely made up. They do say to limit saturated fat but this is evidence-based, as are benefits of whole grains.
I might be wrong, but I suspect that US diets include a greater percentage of simple carbohydrates than most.
There are fat-free versions galore, all either loaded with sugar or artificial sweeteners. Full-fat Greek yogurt is plenty sweet without any additives, and my understanding of the science is that it's much healthier for you, but it's sometimes tricky to find it because there's little demand.
Greek yogurt is bought by people who nominally care about nutrition—its main selling point is higher protein—but because of these guidelines the demand is for the high-protein high-sugar versions and not the naturally sweet full-fat.
Everything was prepared fresh in the morning, placed into bento boxes, and delivered by lunch for consumption. The per-student cost of all of this was ~$35 American -- edit -- $35 for the entire month. Roughly $1.70 a day to feed a student an amazing meal.
I was frankly dumbfounded at how delicious everything looked, and especially for how cheaply everything had been prepared. I would have been delighted to pay $15 or more for this meal.
> Americans have increased grain calories by 28 percent since 1970, while reducing red meat intake equally. Butter and egg consumption dropped as vegetable oil use surged 87 percent. We’ve engineered a dietary disaster, swapping wholesome, satiating foods for processed carbohydrates that leave us hungry and sick.
In one sentence the author says total caloric intake has significantly increased. In the next she says vegetable oil consumption significantly increased, somehow displacing eggs. And finally, she concludes carbohydrates are to blame for obesity. What?
Good thing the medical care is affordable and excellent /s
Consumption of animals have been steeply falling for the last 70 years, while seed oils consumption have grown. If you search for the graph you'll be amazed, it is so clear what is causing this.
Related
Ultra-processed foods need tobacco-style warnings, says scientist
A scientist proposes tobacco-style warnings on ultra-processed foods (UPFs) due to health risks. UPFs displace healthier options, fuel obesity, and chronic diseases. Calls for public health campaigns, restrictions, taxation, and debate on UPFs' impact and regulation.
Food as You Know It Is About to Change
The modern food system faces a "food polycrisis" with rising hunger rates, increased food prices, and climate change impacting agricultural productivity. Urgent changes in practices and diets are necessary for future food security.
We might never know the truth about ultra-processed foods
Ultra-processed foods make up 56% of calorie intake in the UK, especially among children and low-income groups. Their health risks are debated, with calls for more research on their effects.
Why, Are Ultraprocessed Foods So Hard to Resist?
A NIH study is investigating the health impacts of ultraprocessed foods on 36 participants, aiming to understand their appeal and effects on weight gain and health by late 2025.
The Guardian view on meat: we need to eat less of it
The Guardian editorial urges reduced meat consumption due to health risks and environmental impact, highlighting a study linking meat to diabetes and advocating for clearer government guidelines and dietary shifts.