Honey, YouTubers are poisoning the kids
The article critiques YouTubers, particularly MrBeast, for exploiting children through targeted marketing, promoting unhealthy products, and highlights the need for better regulation of advertising aimed at young audiences.
Read original articleThe article discusses the negative impact of YouTubers, particularly MrBeast, on children, highlighting how their content and marketing strategies exploit young audiences. The author observes that children are heavily influenced by social media, often desiring products they see online without understanding the marketing tactics behind them. MrBeast, with his massive following, is criticized for promoting unhealthy food products disguised as healthier options, which are marketed to children. The article also mentions controversies surrounding MrBeast, including allegations of workplace misconduct and exploitation. The author argues that the current system allows for direct advertising to children, who are not equipped to discern the difference between genuine content and marketing. This raises concerns about the ethical responsibilities of content creators and the need for better regulation of advertising aimed at young audiences. The piece concludes with a call for YouTubers to use their influence for positive purposes rather than exploiting vulnerable children for profit.
- YouTubers, especially MrBeast, are criticized for exploiting children through targeted marketing.
- Children are heavily influenced by social media, often desiring products without understanding marketing tactics.
- MrBeast's products are marketed as healthier alternatives but may contain unhealthy ingredients.
- Allegations of misconduct and exploitation have emerged against MrBeast and his brand.
- There is a need for better regulation of advertising aimed at children on platforms like YouTube.
Related
Animal Abuse Is Taking over YouTube [video]
The video discusses animal abuse on social media, particularly YouTube, urging bans on abusive channels and criticizing influencers exploiting wild animals for views, while warning against keeping them as pets.
The Sleazy World of Reddit Marketing, Everything Is Fake
The article highlights unethical marketing practices on Reddit, where moderators exploit their power to promote affiliate links, manipulate engagement, and hijack content, undermining user trust and authenticity.
YouTube to restrict teenagers' exposure to videos about weight and fitness
YouTube will limit recommendations of fitness and body image content for teenagers to prevent negative self-perceptions, aligning with the UK's Online Safety Act and aiming to protect mental health globally.
YouTube to restrict teenagers' exposure to videos about weight and fitness
YouTube will limit recommendations of fitness and body image videos for teenagers to reduce harmful effects on self-image, aligning with the UK's Online Safety Act and receiving support from experts.
FTC: Vast Surveillance of Users by Social Media and Video Streaming Companies
A recent FTC report reveals major social media companies conduct extensive surveillance on users, especially minors, with inadequate privacy controls, urging Congress to enact federal privacy legislation and improve data practices.
And, that's not even going into the non-tech world where it's 10x worse. Years ago that guy got in trouble for posting a dead body from a forest in Japan but just looking at what's recommended it's clear 90% for the content is just people trying to find some random non-topic and hyping it up.
Checking top recommendations right now
"Should I Buy This Chinook Helicopter? Craziest Barn Find Ever!"
"I Played Fortnite on World’s SMALLEST Keyboards"
"10 NEW Costco Deals You NEED To Buy in September 2024"
"I Bought VINTAGE vs NEW Beauty Products"
"My Daughter Survives WORLD'S TINIEST HOUSE"
I supposed the world was always this way given that there was a market for "World Weekly News" but "at scale" with millions more schlock producers it's horrifiying.
For decades (probably centuries!), the phrase "don't take no for an answer" has always been a common sales technique. If the customer says they aren't interested, you don't necessarily just walk away from the sale. You can continue to try. Why wouldn't they have used that extraordinarily common phrase? The paragraph under the header only ever describes the same concept.
Who thought it was appropriate to negate the "no means no" phrasing that has almost exclusively referred to sexual consent for all recent memory?
Or browser with uBlock Origin and plugin Unhook, that lets you block recommendations, shorts, trends, autoplay, etc.
My kids are still far too young for unsupervised YouTube/TV time and are still firmly in the "Bluey or Ms. Rachel" age, but there's already a hardline Mr. Beast ban in my house. Hopefully by the time they're old enough to want that kind of content Mr. Beast is but a memory and YouTube will have much better content controls in place.
Sadly that seems unlikely - and AI-generated content is not going to help.
Beast and so many other YouTubers that target the very malleable 10-13 years are causing brain rot like we've never seen before.
YouTube is not a place for children.
But nowadays? Content theft runs utterly rampant - and I'm not talking about the oh-so-poor multi billion movie conglomerates being the victims here. I'm talking about the countless content farms that get by just 1:1 re-uploading other people's videos. I'm talking about "meme pages" that do just the same, not even bothering to tag the original creators of the stuff they steal. I'm talking about "reaction video" streamers that not just (again) steal other people's content, but often enough drive their rabid fanbase to dogpile upon whomever/whatever they "reacted" upon. All of that driven by the sweet sweet nectar of YouTube Ad revenue sharing.
And that's just the relatively harmless content thieves. Money also drives a lot of other very problematic kinds of YouTubers, especially ever since sponsoring became the norm rather than the exception for those creating high value/effort content: shilling literally dangerous and unsafe supplements, one-shoe-fits-all VPNs promising much but delivering not much to people who don't need them (other than, ironically, to bypass Youtube's geoblocking), even more supplements, cryptocurrencies, various forms of gambling, questionable "mental health" providers that deliver pages upon pages of warnings and horror stories when you just search once for them, scams like "Established Titles" [1]...
Then come all the "pranks" and "challenges" that often enough led to kids and youths injuring themselves in the process [2] (and sometimes unfortunately even killing them such as with the Tide pod challenge [3]), or outright anti-social behavior that got cheered upon by rowdy commenters. Some particularly braindead, ruthless (or however else you want to call them) arseholes exploit homeless people for clicks [6].
And finally, the politics. The alt-right/incel/conspiracy radicalisation funnel has been documented to insane depths [4], but nowadays it seems to have shifted mostly to TikTok [7] as YouTube (finally) took action after widespread media reports [5].
Oh and then the personalities. It sucks that so many streamers - particularly in the German scene [8] - ended up with allegations of all sorts of misconduct. Domestic violence, sexual abuse, grooming of minors in their fan base, the same shit that happens to a lot of stars that got popular as kids, the fame ruins their heads and makes them believe they can get away with anything.
I miss the old Internet, one that was not dominated by people willing to sell out everyone and their dog for clicks and ad revenue. Probably the only YouTuber I can actually still recommend who a) never shilled bullshit in his career and b) still does the same good content he started with is DaveHax. Even Simon's Cat has gone down the drain years ago when every new video turned out to be 75%+ recycled older material...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Established_Titles
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/01/17/youtube...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumption_of_Tide_Pods
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right_pipeline
[5] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/23/youtube-g...
[6] https://www.vice.com/en/article/homeless-people-are-not-prop...
[7] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1472586X.2023.2...
[8] https://www.ingame.de/news/streaming/streamer-skandale-2022-...
Related
Animal Abuse Is Taking over YouTube [video]
The video discusses animal abuse on social media, particularly YouTube, urging bans on abusive channels and criticizing influencers exploiting wild animals for views, while warning against keeping them as pets.
The Sleazy World of Reddit Marketing, Everything Is Fake
The article highlights unethical marketing practices on Reddit, where moderators exploit their power to promote affiliate links, manipulate engagement, and hijack content, undermining user trust and authenticity.
YouTube to restrict teenagers' exposure to videos about weight and fitness
YouTube will limit recommendations of fitness and body image content for teenagers to prevent negative self-perceptions, aligning with the UK's Online Safety Act and aiming to protect mental health globally.
YouTube to restrict teenagers' exposure to videos about weight and fitness
YouTube will limit recommendations of fitness and body image videos for teenagers to reduce harmful effects on self-image, aligning with the UK's Online Safety Act and receiving support from experts.
FTC: Vast Surveillance of Users by Social Media and Video Streaming Companies
A recent FTC report reveals major social media companies conduct extensive surveillance on users, especially minors, with inadequate privacy controls, urging Congress to enact federal privacy legislation and improve data practices.