September 25th, 2024

With Bluesky, the social media echo chamber is back in vogue

Bluesky is gaining traction as users leave X, particularly progressives in the UK. However, it faces criticism for fostering echo chambers, raising concerns about the viability of inclusive digital discourse.

Read original articleLink Icon
With Bluesky, the social media echo chamber is back in vogue

Bluesky, a social media platform founded by Twitter's Jack Dorsey, has emerged as a popular alternative for users disillusioned with Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter). This shift has been particularly noticeable among progressive users in the UK, where active daily users on X have dropped significantly, from 8 million to 5.6 million over the past year. Many users are migrating to Bluesky, which has seen rapid growth, especially among media professionals and academics, despite having fewer total users compared to Meta's Threads app. However, Bluesky has been criticized for fostering an echo chamber, where users predominantly share similar viewpoints, contrasting with Musk's earlier warnings about the dangers of social media polarization. While some users appreciate the platform for its civil discourse and shared ideologies, the concern remains that such environments may limit exposure to diverse perspectives. The article raises questions about the viability of a "digital town square" and whether social media can facilitate meaningful engagement across differing viewpoints, suggesting that the current trend towards siloed communities may undermine this ideal.

- Bluesky is gaining popularity among users leaving X due to dissatisfaction with its current direction.

- Active users on X have significantly decreased, particularly among progressive demographics.

- Bluesky is criticized for creating an echo chamber, limiting diverse viewpoints.

- The platform is favored for its civil discourse among like-minded individuals.

- The article questions the feasibility of a truly inclusive digital town square in social media.

Link Icon 8 comments
By @Andaith - 4 months
> It comes down, in the end, to whether or not you believe that the “digital town square” Musk talked about when he bought Twitter can really exist and, if it can, whether it is of any benefit to anyone.

I'd argue the moderation is the issue. It's one thing to have a discussion between different ideologies, but there's no more conservatives to discuss anything with. They've left twitter too, and the only people left are... not engaging in good faith discussions, to be polite about it.

Users seem to have an expectation of(or rather a desire for) civility, moreso than echo chamber agreement, but the current owner of twitter seems to think that restricting hate-speech is restricting free-speech. Then, for whatever moderation is left, all the most popular alt-right accounts also get an exemption from that, which encourages all their followers to be their worst version of themself.

By @nitwit005 - 4 months
> but the problem is that the chatterati — very nice and non-conspiracy-theorising and non-overtly-racist though they may be — tend to coalesce around some quite similar viewpoints, which makes for a rather echoey chamber.

Are any of us truly going to live better lives if we see a bunch of conspiracy theories and racist rants?

Some of those posts are a result of genuine mental illness. I have a clinically retarded uncle who is a big fan of nazi stuff. I'm glad the internet wasn't around when he was young.

By @mplewis - 4 months
The only people I see complaining about “social media echo chambers” are the ones who other people have decided they don’t want to be near.

Good riddance to them. You aren’t entitled to bother others if they don’t want to hear from you.

By @ZeroGravitas - 4 months
She decided that it was less of an echo chamber when lots of people on the platform disagreed loudly with her opinion, which is good in her mind I suppose?
By @talldayo - 4 months
If you think Bluesky is relatively progressive then Mastodon would abhor you.
By @NavinF - 4 months