October 2nd, 2024

I Exited the Cloud

The author details how migrating from AWS to self-managed servers can save over $15,000 annually, emphasizing quick migration, reduced management time, and the affordability of self-hosting for small businesses.

Read original articleLink Icon
I Exited the Cloud

The author, rameerez, shares insights on how he significantly reduced his monthly infrastructure costs by migrating from AWS to self-managed servers, saving over $15,000 annually. He highlights that the migration process took less than an hour for production once the necessary steps were established, although initial testing and preparation took several days. He emphasizes that managing self-hosted servers does not require a full-time commitment, countering the common belief that cloud services are easier to maintain. The author argues that cloud services like AWS are overpriced and overly complex for small to medium-sized businesses, which often do not require the extensive features offered. He explains that the cost of servers has decreased due to technological advancements, making self-hosting a more viable option. The migration process involves replicating existing services on AWS to a single server or a minimal setup, which can be done efficiently with the right scripts and configurations. He provides resources for others interested in making a similar transition, including detailed guides and scripts for setting up servers. Ultimately, he believes that the savings from self-hosting outweigh the potential risks associated with downtime or data recovery.

- Migrating from AWS to self-managed servers can save significant costs.

- The migration process can be completed quickly with proper preparation and automation.

- Managing self-hosted servers is not as time-consuming as often perceived.

- Cloud services are often overpriced for small to medium-sized businesses.

- Technological advancements have made self-hosting more accessible and affordable.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @YmiYugy - 4 months
I actually thought the opposite. If you are small you want to move quickly and spend as much energy as possible on developing the product not managing infrastructure. There is a lot involved, OS updates, certificate management, secrets, multiple tiers of backups, but also monitoring and alerts, etc. If you have a lot of customers and server cost on the other hand, it makes sense to employ a dev ops team, that can focus on optimizing costs.
By @nasmorn - 4 months
Doesn’t fully convince me as having a single physical server is very different than a managed DB. If you have a disk failure you will be down until that is resolved. Which is in fact the exact scenario that happened to a client of mine and which led me to migrate to the cloud
By @DHPersonal - 4 months
Oh, it’s time for the cycle to flip back to on-premises servers?
By @erik_seaberg - 4 months
With serious users, I would feel compelled to warn about the outage risks I were taking.