You Can't Opt-Out of A.I. Online
Users face challenges opting out of AI data usage on social media, with limited legal protections and prevalent low-quality AI-generated content. Proactive management of online presence is necessary.
Read original articleThe article discusses the challenges users face when trying to opt out of artificial intelligence (AI) data usage on social media platforms. Recently, many Instagram users shared a message claiming to deny permission for Meta to use their personal data, but this action has no legal effect. In the U.S., there are no laws protecting public posts from AI scraping, although users can set their accounts to private to limit data access. In contrast, users in the UK and EU have stronger data protection rights. While some platforms like X and LinkedIn offer options to manage data sharing, the overall trend is that tech companies benefit from user-generated content for AI development, making it difficult for users to completely avoid AI-generated content. The article highlights the prevalence of low-quality AI-generated content, referred to as "slop," which clutters social media feeds. Despite users' discomfort with this content, it remains popular and profitable for platforms. The lack of regulation and the recent veto of an AI regulation bill in California suggest that users may have to navigate this landscape on their own. The article concludes that while opting out of AI is challenging, users must take proactive steps to manage their online presence.
- Users cannot effectively opt out of AI data usage by simply posting objections on social media.
- Setting accounts to private can limit data scraping, but it also reduces visibility.
- AI-generated content, often of low quality, is prevalent on social media and difficult to filter out.
- There is a lack of regulation regarding AI content on social platforms.
- Users may need to take individual actions to manage their online data and content exposure.
Related
My Memories Are Just Meta's Training Data Now
Meta's use of personal content from Facebook and Instagram for AI training raises privacy concerns. European response led to a temporary pause, reflecting the ongoing debate on tech companies utilizing personal data for AI development.
Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted since 2007
Meta has acknowledged using public posts from adult users on Facebook and Instagram for AI training since 2007, raising privacy concerns and highlighting the need for stronger regulations.
LinkedIn scraped user data for training before updating its terms of service
LinkedIn trained AI models using user data without prior consent updates, affecting U.S. users. An opt-out option was added later, prompting calls for investigations into its data practices.
LinkedIn Is Training AI on User Data
LinkedIn is using user data for generative AI training without consent, allowing users to opt out for future use but not past training. Privacy measures are claimed to be in place.
LinkedIn does not use European users' data for training its AI
LinkedIn has faced criticism for using user data for AI training without consent, prompting privacy concerns. EU users are excluded, highlighting GDPR's effectiveness, while critics demand explicit consent for data usage.
Adding a few magic words to bewitch the AI into not scraping your profile is the new superstition of the digital era, a cousin to the pseudolegal "no copyright intended" incantation often seen on pirated YouTube videos of yesteryear. You cannot have your cake and eat it too, for there is a fundamental tradeoff between privacy and convenience as popularized by Schneier, 11 years ago. [0] You must stop using the platform and do something other than continue to consume vapid social media nonsense; yet no one ever listens or cares, for the revealed preference of the masses is to continue to not be users of the system but to be used in exchange for "free" access to these platforms.
[0] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/trading_priva...
It's true that it is quite hard, but there are ways to reduce it for sure. Here is what I have done:
1. I've deleted accounts for websites that promote AI. I have already deleted LinkedIn, Github, Medium, and a few others.
2. I have stopped supporting businesses that use AI/support ones that are against AI. For example, the company behind the Procreate iPad app is 100% against AI so I support them. Also, in my professional life, I have already refused to collaborate with three separate companies due to their promotion and use of AI.
3. I've deactivated any tools that could be AI based like assisted writing tools in Gmail.
4. I do not click or read any articles with AI-generated images or text. Nor do I watch any videos any more.
5. I am reconnecting with friends and share with them through email and other means.
In my opinion, the internet has gotten WAY worse with the introduction of generative AI. Generative AI itself is not the root cause of course: the aggressive capitalistic takeover of the internet is, but AI is the apex tool for that and it makes the internet a rather horrible place.
Personally, I run a large-ish niche FB group and I haven't seen a threat of bots taking over there or other online spaces. Is there anywhere that people have seen the bots crowding out the people? My guess is Twitter but that place would already/always a sewer.
Like Rick and Morty did in simulation.
At least it would cost a lot more to harvest one's article for the harvesting company
-Mark Zuckerberg.
Actually, you did. What you didn't do is read the fucking terms of service.
But sarcasm aside, it is a general failure of the system that things have gotten to this point. The amount of naivete like is seen above is tremendous, yet somehow we and everyone who understands this crap have failed to deliver the memo.
Related
My Memories Are Just Meta's Training Data Now
Meta's use of personal content from Facebook and Instagram for AI training raises privacy concerns. European response led to a temporary pause, reflecting the ongoing debate on tech companies utilizing personal data for AI development.
Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted since 2007
Meta has acknowledged using public posts from adult users on Facebook and Instagram for AI training since 2007, raising privacy concerns and highlighting the need for stronger regulations.
LinkedIn scraped user data for training before updating its terms of service
LinkedIn trained AI models using user data without prior consent updates, affecting U.S. users. An opt-out option was added later, prompting calls for investigations into its data practices.
LinkedIn Is Training AI on User Data
LinkedIn is using user data for generative AI training without consent, allowing users to opt out for future use but not past training. Privacy measures are claimed to be in place.
LinkedIn does not use European users' data for training its AI
LinkedIn has faced criticism for using user data for AI training without consent, prompting privacy concerns. EU users are excluded, highlighting GDPR's effectiveness, while critics demand explicit consent for data usage.