End of fluoridation of US water could be in sight after federal court ruling

A recent federal court ruling may signal the end of water fluoridation in the United States, as it mandates the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to conduct a risk assessment regarding fluoride's potential neurotoxic effects on children. The ruling, made by Judge Edward Chen, highlights concerns that fluoride, commonly added to drinking water since 1945, could lower children's IQs and cause developmental harm. This decision is seen as a significant victory for opponents of fluoridation, who argue that a growing body of scientific evidence supports their claims. The EPA is now required to evaluate fluoride levels under the Toxic Substances Control Act, which could lead to new regulations. While the American Dental Association maintains that fluoridated water is safe, the ruling has prompted some water systems, including those serving Salt Lake City, to halt or suspend fluoridation. The debate over fluoridation has been contentious, with many in the medical community still supporting the practice despite emerging evidence of its risks. Advocates for ending fluoridation argue that public sentiment has shifted, with many citizens opposing the practice. The ruling reflects a broader reassessment of long-held beliefs about fluoride's safety, reminiscent of past public health changes regarding substances like lead.

- A federal court ruling requires the EPA to assess fluoride's risks, potentially ending water fluoridation.

- Concerns have been raised about fluoride's neurotoxic effects on children's IQs.

- The ruling is viewed as a significant win for anti-fluoridation advocates.

- Some water systems have already suspended fluoridation following the ruling.

- The debate continues, with many in the medical community still supporting fluoridation.