Making the Web Boring Again
The article critiques the evolution of web browsers, advocating for stability and simplicity over rapid updates, highlighting user dissatisfaction with current trends and a shift towards alternatives like Pale Moon.
Read original articleThe article discusses the evolution of web browsers from the relatively stable and boring versions of the 2000s to the rapid-release models dominated by Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox. The shift towards a "Living Standard" has led to increased complexity and a focus on constant updates, which some users feel has compromised the identity and stability of browsers like Firefox. The author expresses frustration with Mozilla's direction, particularly its focus on features like AI chatbots instead of user needs. This dissatisfaction has led to a shift towards alternatives like Pale Moon, which prioritize stability and user-friendly updates. The piece argues for a return to a slower, more stable web experience that can better serve minority platforms and resist corporate monopolization. It highlights the importance of maintaining a universal web browser that focuses on essential web technologies rather than chasing trends. The author concludes with hope for a future where simpler web services can thrive, countering the dominance of complex, ad-driven applications.
- The shift to rapid-release models has complicated web browser stability.
- Users are seeking alternatives like Pale Moon for a more stable browsing experience.
- There is a call for a return to simpler web standards to resist corporate control.
- The article emphasizes the need for a universal web browser that prioritizes essential technologies.
- Services that simplify web interactions are seen as a potential future direction for the web.
Related
I'm funding Ladybird because I can't fund Firefox
The author supports Ladybird Browser Initiative over Firefox due to concerns about browser competition dominated by Chrome. Ladybird aims for a non-profit model, offering an alternative for a diverse web ecosystem.
Dear Safari, Things I Hate About You
The article critiques Safari for privacy concerns due to its Google partnership, declining speed, buggy web extensions, and restrictive iOS policies, urging improvements to regain user loyalty and trust.
The Dying Web
Matthias Endler critiques Google Chrome's dominance in the browser market, advocating for Firefox due to its privacy and customizability, and warns against the dangers of browser monoculture for web diversity.
The Neverending Story
The article highlights that corporate attempts to dominate web technologies often fail, while collaboration on web standards like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript ensures accessibility and long-term success over proprietary solutions.
Testing the Firefox Alternatives
Mozilla's Firefox faces user criticism for prioritizing AI features over core functionality. Alternatives like LibreWolf, Floorp, and Zen are gaining popularity for better privacy and usability, despite their own challenges.
Has anyone here seriously tried Pale Moon which is referenced in the linked blog post? How does it do for everyday browsing and ad/tracker blocking?
All of this is especially hard to take in the form of #000 text on #FFF background with no headings or context… Design principles are science, not zoomer corruptions!
Anybody can easily put text, images, video, audio online.
Finding something that is interesting is the hard part for me.
I would like to see examples of individuals putting out interesting content.
I mean apart from entertainment. Not stuff that is just funny or beautiful or thrilling.
Is there any blogger, tweeter, activitipubber, blueskyer, nostrerer or whatever out there, where you guys think "Damn what they are doing is cool and interesting. I learn something from it for my life. I can't wait for the next update!"?
If it was, I think we’d see as many new browsers as we do independent small game engines.
I suspect two things: it’s so poorly defined that we’ll have to accept this to accept new browsers, and that we will have to blatantly ignore it in order to create a simplified standard alternative layout algorithm.
People have Internet Explorer a lot of crap for being non-standard but there is no standard. All the intern projects like WASP did absolutely nothing to make CSS well-defined.
It just created the industry expectation that we’d all copy each other to fill in the gaps. If you read the codebases of the major web browser engines, it’s clear they do this in small but meaningful ways that would otherwise break various layout properties.
So I say screw it, since the people at Google basically hijacked web standards and refuse to give us popularly asked for features (check the web standards issue trackers for years-long open feature requests) just ignore them.
Make people bend the web standards to what you want them to be and then rally people to use your browser for fun and the love of using technologies that don’t hate you and abuse your expectations of privacy and the value of the hardware that you buy.
The internet has completely consolidated itself into a few websites now, and that's the entirety of people's experience using the internet now. They go to, at most like 5 or so separate sites regularly if that many and that's it. As well, social media is made to feel ephemeral so you must check it every 10 minutes or you'll have lost loads of context or information and be out of the loop- forget about doing it only once a day. Since Twitter, tumblr, instagram etc have closed their APIs, there's no chance at accessing updates through an external reader, and you're forced to scroll and scroll to get anything, most of which now isn't even who you follow but rather just what they assume you might like or what is garnering the most rage engagement at the time.
back in the old days, "surfing" was a huge part of your internet usage: after you checked up on your forum threads and usenet keywords- which was easy to do since you were able to simply read up and then you were caught up for the day- you could check out affiliate links or webrings for new sites to enjoy. Surfing around was lots of fun and you found a bunch of new stuff all the time that way, and almost all of it was made by hand by one or a few people.
I enjoyed Live Journal, where if you were a fan of whatever early 00s TV series or movie, there'd be a community made there for you to go and instantly fold in with a bunch of other fans. No need for pretense or establishing context, they'd all watched the show as well, and you wouldn't have to tone down references or discussion for laymen who stumbled across it like you do for most social media today. You can't have an in-depth conversation about something you enjoy on social media, and if you try, you're in a crowded room yelling over other people walking by, everyone can hear and see, and you're forced to act like you're being observed by thousands of passers-by instead of having a conversation in a room.
the vibe is so different. Everyone I know who used the internet back then remembers it fondly, and kids today who never did think it's a much better idea. What do we have to do to just... go back?
Related
I'm funding Ladybird because I can't fund Firefox
The author supports Ladybird Browser Initiative over Firefox due to concerns about browser competition dominated by Chrome. Ladybird aims for a non-profit model, offering an alternative for a diverse web ecosystem.
Dear Safari, Things I Hate About You
The article critiques Safari for privacy concerns due to its Google partnership, declining speed, buggy web extensions, and restrictive iOS policies, urging improvements to regain user loyalty and trust.
The Dying Web
Matthias Endler critiques Google Chrome's dominance in the browser market, advocating for Firefox due to its privacy and customizability, and warns against the dangers of browser monoculture for web diversity.
The Neverending Story
The article highlights that corporate attempts to dominate web technologies often fail, while collaboration on web standards like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript ensures accessibility and long-term success over proprietary solutions.
Testing the Firefox Alternatives
Mozilla's Firefox faces user criticism for prioritizing AI features over core functionality. Alternatives like LibreWolf, Floorp, and Zen are gaining popularity for better privacy and usability, despite their own challenges.