Dear Safari, Things I Hate About You
The article critiques Safari for privacy concerns due to its Google partnership, declining speed, buggy web extensions, and restrictive iOS policies, urging improvements to regain user loyalty and trust.
Read original articleThe article expresses dissatisfaction with Safari, highlighting four main issues that have led to a decline in user loyalty. Firstly, it criticizes Safari's partnership with Google, suggesting that it compromises user privacy by sharing browsing data. The author urges Safari to prioritize user privacy and end this relationship to regain trust. Secondly, the article notes that Safari's speed and performance have diminished over time, with other browsers catching up. The author calls for Safari to reclaim its status as the fastest browser on its own platform. Thirdly, while Safari has adopted web extensions, the author points out that the implementation is buggy, affecting functionalities like ad blocking. The need for better testing and quality assurance is emphasized. Lastly, the article addresses Safari's restrictive policies on iOS, which limit users to WebKit as the only browsing engine. The author argues for more competition and variety in browser options on iOS, suggesting that this would ultimately benefit Safari by fostering improvement. The overall tone conveys a sense of nostalgia for Safari's earlier days and a desire for the browser to evolve and address these critical issues to maintain its user base.
Related
How to waste bandwidth, battery power, and annoy sysadmins
Web browsers' excessive requests waste bandwidth and drain battery. Firefox for iOS' flawed link requests, especially for favicons, strain servers inefficiently. Users are cautioned about negative impacts, stressing efficient browsing.
I'm funding Ladybird because I can't fund Firefox
The author supports Ladybird Browser Initiative over Firefox due to concerns about browser competition dominated by Chrome. Ladybird aims for a non-profit model, offering an alternative for a diverse web ecosystem.
Some thoughts on the web. On web engines, content, and web rent (2023)
Chromium's dominance, Google's influence, and privacy concerns are discussed. The article questions browsers' user-centricity versus ad networks' interests, Google's impact on web standards, and the shift towards web-based services. Future tech developments are hinted.
Apple tells over a billion iPhone users to stop using Chrome
Apple launches attack ad against Google Chrome, citing privacy issues and promoting Safari for iPhone users. Google defends Chrome's privacy features. Safari and Chrome competition intensifies over user privacy perceptions.
Safari already contains ad tracking technology, in Private Browsing mode too
Safari integrates ad tracking tech in Private Browsing, diverging from privacy norms. WebKit adds Web AdAttributionKit for privacy-preserving ad measurement. Apple's ad partnerships signal a shift towards online advertising, sparking privacy debates.
I feel like one of the biggest problems is, well what are the alternatives? I use Firefox on my PC but since that is primarily for gaming I don't really need the interconnectivity. On my Mac, iPhone, and iPad the way everything works together is just way too valuable.
I wish it's memory didnt just keep inching higher and higher and I need to close it regularly, but I don't know if that is unqiue to Safari or if it would happen on other browsers if I opened way too many windows and tabs.
That being said: "Everyone knows about your tawdry Google relationship" yeah that needs to be addressed and is the same reason I don't consider Chrome an option. Everything else, I am not convinced any other browser is really much better.
Performance I understand, its hard to compete with v8 and JS is pumped down our pipes in ever-growing amounts.
Extensions are poor, truly, with this I agree. But extensions are also a huge reason that people consider browsers to be unperformant (hilariously, based on my previous statement). I can understand the Safari team being less than excited to permit even worse performance.
It should be possible to set the default search engine to any URL with a ?q= parameter.
The alternatives are not prefect, nothing is. But they are all more open and that is something we can build upon.
It's made by folks at Kagi.
Their claim that Safari has gotten slow is that other browsers have gotten better, not that there has been any negative performance changes. I would suspect that HTML rendering as well as Javascript execution have significant diminishing returns on performance improvement investments.
Their first reference it there being issues with Web Extensions was to some person's random GitHub issue tracker, which isn't being updated when issues are fixed and doesn't necessarily provide a FB number to show it was raised to Apple. This IMHO is somewhat Apple's fault as they haven't contributed a Web Extension API component to WebKit; it is a Safari feature and needs to be raised as Feedback (which is then not externally referencable, and may not be updated as internal duplicates of the issue are closed).
The 4th thing in the article title/headline "Dear Safari, 4 Things I Hate About You"... seems to be missing?
Or fixing the erasure of URLs from older tabs? Impossible to easily reload (but Translate to.../then view original does the trick).
Safari did the fundamentals quickly and solidly. Now not so much.
I don't mind if Google is an option, but there should be an easy way to add third party search engines too (On top of the new modal where you can pick your default search engine in the EU at least).
For Kagi you have to install an extension just to overwrite that: https://help.kagi.com/kagi/getting-started/setting-default.h...
1. Massive memory consumption if left running to long 2. Randomly says "you are trying to close two tabs!" when you only have highlighted one 3. Randomly just stops loading a tab, and you have to literally close that tab and open a new one 4. Randomly opens a new tab in a random window when clicking, and you have to hunt for it 5. Hardcoded search engines
That's just off the top of my head.
https://webkit.org/blog/7929/designing-websites-for-iphone-x...
When I open (click) on a folder in the bookmarks toolbar and then hover on adjacent folders it doesn't automatically open them, I also have to click on them. For this single feature alone, I never could use this browser.
Of course they know, they specifically requested it.
i'd say they've gotten worse even.
and expecting me to create an Apple ID and then download 30GB of xcode crap just to port my 5kb chrome extension to safari. yea right.
Related
How to waste bandwidth, battery power, and annoy sysadmins
Web browsers' excessive requests waste bandwidth and drain battery. Firefox for iOS' flawed link requests, especially for favicons, strain servers inefficiently. Users are cautioned about negative impacts, stressing efficient browsing.
I'm funding Ladybird because I can't fund Firefox
The author supports Ladybird Browser Initiative over Firefox due to concerns about browser competition dominated by Chrome. Ladybird aims for a non-profit model, offering an alternative for a diverse web ecosystem.
Some thoughts on the web. On web engines, content, and web rent (2023)
Chromium's dominance, Google's influence, and privacy concerns are discussed. The article questions browsers' user-centricity versus ad networks' interests, Google's impact on web standards, and the shift towards web-based services. Future tech developments are hinted.
Apple tells over a billion iPhone users to stop using Chrome
Apple launches attack ad against Google Chrome, citing privacy issues and promoting Safari for iPhone users. Google defends Chrome's privacy features. Safari and Chrome competition intensifies over user privacy perceptions.
Safari already contains ad tracking technology, in Private Browsing mode too
Safari integrates ad tracking tech in Private Browsing, diverging from privacy norms. WebKit adds Web AdAttributionKit for privacy-preserving ad measurement. Apple's ad partnerships signal a shift towards online advertising, sparking privacy debates.