Concerns Raised over Bitwarden Moving Further Away from Open-Source
Bitwarden is criticized for straying from open-source principles due to a new SDK dependency limiting use to its applications. Concerns about its free software classification have emerged, with public discourse restricted.
Read original articleConcerns have emerged regarding Bitwarden's shift away from open-source principles, particularly following a recent pull request that introduced a new dependency for building the desktop client. This dependency includes a clause that restricts its use to Bitwarden applications only, raising questions about the software's classification as free software. Users have expressed their worries on GitHub, highlighting that the SDK's licensing terms may prevent its use in non-Bitwarden applications. Bitwarden's founder and CTO, Kyle Spearrin, responded to these concerns, clarifying that the SDK and the client are separate programs and that the issue is a bug they plan to resolve. However, the GitHub ticket discussing these issues has since been locked, limiting further public discourse. The situation has sparked a broader discussion about the future of Bitwarden and its commitment to open-source software.
- Bitwarden faces criticism for moving away from open-source principles.
- A new SDK dependency restricts usage to Bitwarden applications only.
- Concerns were raised on GitHub regarding the software's classification as free software.
- Bitwarden's CTO clarified that the SDK and client are separate programs.
- The GitHub discussion has been locked, limiting public input on the issue.
Related
Bitwarden (the SDK and mobile app) is not FOSS
Bitwarden password manager faces licensing challenges due to its non-FOSS SDK, limiting its availability on platforms like F-Droid. Community forums discuss implications and hurdles for FOSS compatibility.
Let's not celebrate CrowdStrike – let's point to a better way
The Free Software Foundation criticizes the CrowdStrike incident, advocating for decentralized free software to reduce reliance on proprietary providers, emphasizing informed consent for updates and better collaboration among developers.
Ask HN: Concern over Chinese Software?
Concerns about Chinese software are rising due to U.S.-China tensions, CCP influence, and privacy issues. The author highlights challenges in avoiding Chinese products and seeks strategies to mitigate risks.
Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source?
Microsoft is experiencing internal conflict over its commitment to open source, particularly with the .NET platform, following the restriction of the "Hot Reload" feature to proprietary products, prompting community backlash.
Concerns Raised over Bitwarden Moving Further Away from Open-Source
Bitwarden faces criticism for moving away from open-source principles due to a new SDK dependency with restrictive licensing. The founder clarified the SDK and client are separate, but community concerns persist.
Related
Bitwarden (the SDK and mobile app) is not FOSS
Bitwarden password manager faces licensing challenges due to its non-FOSS SDK, limiting its availability on platforms like F-Droid. Community forums discuss implications and hurdles for FOSS compatibility.
Let's not celebrate CrowdStrike – let's point to a better way
The Free Software Foundation criticizes the CrowdStrike incident, advocating for decentralized free software to reduce reliance on proprietary providers, emphasizing informed consent for updates and better collaboration among developers.
Ask HN: Concern over Chinese Software?
Concerns about Chinese software are rising due to U.S.-China tensions, CCP influence, and privacy issues. The author highlights challenges in avoiding Chinese products and seeks strategies to mitigate risks.
Can we trust Microsoft with Open Source?
Microsoft is experiencing internal conflict over its commitment to open source, particularly with the .NET platform, following the restriction of the "Hot Reload" feature to proprietary products, prompting community backlash.
Concerns Raised over Bitwarden Moving Further Away from Open-Source
Bitwarden faces criticism for moving away from open-source principles due to a new SDK dependency with restrictive licensing. The founder clarified the SDK and client are separate, but community concerns persist.