Brandolini's Law
Brandolini's law illustrates the greater effort needed to debunk misinformation compared to its creation, exacerbated by social media, highlighting challenges in public health and gendered disinformation.
Read original article
Brandolini's law, also known as the bullshit asymmetry principle, was coined by Italian programmer Alberto Brandolini in 2013. It highlights the significant disparity between the effort required to debunk misinformation and the ease with which it can be created. The law states that the energy needed to refute falsehoods is substantially greater than that needed to produce them. This phenomenon has been exacerbated by the rise of social media, which facilitates the rapid spread of misinformation. Notable examples include the false claim linking vaccines to autism and the spread of rumors following the Boston Marathon bombing. The law underscores the challenges faced by individuals and organizations in combating misinformation, particularly in high-stakes situations like public health crises. Researchers suggest that combating misinformation requires a multifaceted approach, including establishing the credibility of information, engaging in clear communication, and acknowledging the potential for misunderstanding. Additionally, the law has implications for gendered disinformation, where false narratives are used to undermine women's participation in public discourse. Overall, Brandolini's law serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in addressing misinformation in the digital age.
- Brandolini's law emphasizes the greater effort needed to refute misinformation compared to its creation.
- Social media amplifies the spread of false information, making it harder to correct.
- Notable examples of misinformation include vaccine-autism claims and post-Boston Marathon rumors.
- Combating misinformation requires clear communication and credibility assessment.
- The law also highlights issues of gendered disinformation affecting women's public participation.
Related
Nobody knows what's going on
Misinformation's impact on beliefs, reliance on unreliable sources, and human tendency to trust comforting information are discussed. Difficulty in discerning truth and consequences of widespread misinformation are highlighted.
I Study Disinformation. This Election Will Be Grim.
Renée DiResta warns about the surge in election disinformation in the US, fueled by false claims of the 2020 election being stolen. She stresses the need to combat misinformation despite facing backlash and threats. The Stanford Internet Observatory had to adjust its focus due to pressures.
Why do people believe true things?
Dan Williams argues that understanding true beliefs is more challenging than false ones, emphasizing the complexities of knowledge formation amid misinformation, cognitive biases, and social influences, particularly regarding wealth and poverty.
When Fact-Checks Backfire
Recent discussions highlight the "backfire effect" in fact-checking, where corrections can entrench false beliefs. However, respectful approaches may foster belief change, emphasizing the need to understand beliefs versus attitudes.
Labelling Trump lies as disputed makes supporters believe them more, study finds
A study found that labeling Donald Trump's false election fraud claims as "disputed" may reinforce his supporters' beliefs, particularly among politically knowledgeable individuals, raising concerns about misinformation labeling effectiveness.
2 commentsRelated
Nobody knows what's going on
Misinformation's impact on beliefs, reliance on unreliable sources, and human tendency to trust comforting information are discussed. Difficulty in discerning truth and consequences of widespread misinformation are highlighted.
I Study Disinformation. This Election Will Be Grim.
Renée DiResta warns about the surge in election disinformation in the US, fueled by false claims of the 2020 election being stolen. She stresses the need to combat misinformation despite facing backlash and threats. The Stanford Internet Observatory had to adjust its focus due to pressures.
Why do people believe true things?
Dan Williams argues that understanding true beliefs is more challenging than false ones, emphasizing the complexities of knowledge formation amid misinformation, cognitive biases, and social influences, particularly regarding wealth and poverty.
When Fact-Checks Backfire
Recent discussions highlight the "backfire effect" in fact-checking, where corrections can entrench false beliefs. However, respectful approaches may foster belief change, emphasizing the need to understand beliefs versus attitudes.
Labelling Trump lies as disputed makes supporters believe them more, study finds
A study found that labeling Donald Trump's false election fraud claims as "disputed" may reinforce his supporters' beliefs, particularly among politically knowledgeable individuals, raising concerns about misinformation labeling effectiveness.