October 26th, 2024

1933 and the Definition of Fascism

The article analyzes fascism and evaluates Donald Trump's classification as a fascist, emphasizing the need to recognize authoritarian threats before they gain power and the complexities of political rhetoric.

Read original articleLink Icon
1933 and the Definition of Fascism

The article discusses the definitions of fascism and examines whether Donald Trump can be classified as a fascist based on his statements and political actions. The author emphasizes the importance of understanding historical contexts, particularly the rise of fascist leaders like Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini, who gained power not through majority support but through manipulation and the gullibility of traditional conservative politicians. The piece highlights that both leaders promised moderation while harboring violent intentions, ultimately dismantling democratic systems once in power. The author warns that the time to prevent an authoritarian takeover is before such leaders assume office, as they often disregard democratic processes once in power. The article concludes by stressing the need to critically assess political rhetoric and recognize the potential dangers of aligning with authoritarian figures, while clarifying that not all right-wing politicians are fascists.

- The rise of fascist leaders often involved manipulation of conservative politicians who believed they could control them.

- Hitler and Mussolini gained power without majority support, using violence and intimidation to suppress opposition.

- Once in power, fascists quickly dismantled democratic institutions and concentrated power.

- It is crucial to recognize and take seriously the threats posed by authoritarian figures before they assume office.

- Not all right-wing politicians are fascists, but caution is needed in alliances with those who exhibit authoritarian tendencies.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @kayo_20211030 - 6 months
The analysis is dead on. In the American political system, a two party system, the lily-livered SPD's and Victor Emmanuel are represented by those who fail to vote, or actively work against a dastardly outcome; whether they're the abstainers, or GOP fellow-travelers who believe they can control the maelstrom. As the piece says: if you fail there is no next time.
By @crazydoggers - 6 months
What’s important to note about this analysis is that it’s well researched with links to sources. A reader is free to disagree with what the evidence may demonstrate or not, but at least it provides an education. This is the type of political discourse that we need more of rather than the vitriol that has become standard fair.
By @DougN7 - 6 months
Those who don’t know their history are cursed to repeat it. And unfortunately, if 51% of the population doesn’t know their history, everyone gets to repeat it :(
By @Synaesthesia - 6 months
The difference between Fascism of the 30’s and today is that in the 30’s there was a mass movement which was organised as part of the Fascist parties. Whereas today that is missing. The notion of “Inverted totalitarianism” by Sheldon Wolin, I think encapsulates our current political situation.
By @xtiansimon - 6 months
WNYC’s On the Media had a story on Fascism last week:

“Host Brooke Gladstone speaks with Jason Stanley, a professor of Philosophy at Yale University and who has written several books on fascism. He first warned about Trump’s fascist rhetoric in 2018, and explains why it's more important than ever to call it by its name.”

https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/otm/articles/fascism-fe...

By @readthenotes1 - 6 months
"The time to stop an authoritarian takeover of a democratic system is before the authoritarian is in office, "

So we should have some solace that Trump has already been in office and unable to continue, did not lock Clinton up as he promised, etc.