November 25th, 2024

Perhaps Acquiring Pixelmator Is About Competing with Creative Cloud

Apple's acquisition of Pixelmator aims to enhance its creative software offerings, potentially shifting towards a subscription model similar to Adobe's Creative Cloud, appealing to users seeking comprehensive creative applications.

Read original articleLink Icon
FrustrationSkepticismConcern
Perhaps Acquiring Pixelmator Is About Competing with Creative Cloud

Apple's recent acquisition of Pixelmator may not be aimed directly at competing with Adobe's Photoshop and Lightroom, but rather at enhancing its own creative software offerings within a subscription model similar to Adobe's Creative Cloud. The pricing strategy for Apple's Final Cut Pro and Logic Pro for iPad, which are available at $5/month or $50/year, contrasts with the one-time purchase model for their Mac counterparts, which remain at $199.99 and $299.99 respectively. This suggests that Apple is considering a shift towards subscription pricing for its professional tools. Adobe's Creative Cloud bundle, which provides access to a wide range of applications for a monthly fee, has set a precedent in the industry. While Apple has not yet adopted a subscription model for Final Cut Pro 11, the potential for a bundled offering that includes Pixelmator and other creative tools could be on the horizon. Such a bundle could appeal to users looking for a comprehensive suite of creative applications at a competitive price, potentially positioning Apple as a more formidable competitor in the creative software market.

- Apple's acquisition of Pixelmator may be aimed at enhancing its creative software offerings.

- The pricing strategy for Apple's iPad apps contrasts with the one-time purchase model for Mac apps.

- Adobe's Creative Cloud has set a precedent for subscription pricing in the creative software industry.

- A potential future bundle from Apple could include Pixelmator and other creative tools.

- Subscription models are becoming increasingly dominant in professional creative tools.

AI: What people are saying
The comments reflect skepticism and concern regarding Apple's acquisition of Pixelmator and its potential shift to a subscription model.
  • Many users doubt Apple's commitment to professional tools, fearing integration into existing apps rather than standalone offerings.
  • Concerns about the subscription model harming user experience and pricing fairness are prevalent, with comparisons to Adobe's Creative Cloud.
  • Some commenters suggest that Apple may prefer a one-time fee model for its professional software to maintain goodwill with existing users.
  • There is speculation about whether Apple will expand Pixelmator to other platforms like Windows or the web to compete effectively.
  • Several users express a preference for alternative pricing models, such as paid updates or hybrid subscription options.
Link Icon 12 comments
By @whywhywhywhy - about 2 months
Zero chance Apple is getting back into professional tools, this team and their work will be rolled into the photo app edit view at least and that Freeform app they have at most.
By @oidar - about 2 months
I really hope they don't go this way. The only software that I can think of that Apple offers as subscription is Filemaker (Claris is an apple company). I believe the subscription model has harmed FileMaker, as more Filemaker developers are shifting to frameworks for building web apps due to the unreasonable per-user pricing.
By @herf - about 2 months
Just running Creative Cloud's daemons seems to double my Macbook's power usage. (I have a startup script to kill most of it because of this.) Maybe the battery life tail wagging the dog here, but there is something smart about displacing this mess with an...app? Which is all I ever wanted.
By @wyre - about 2 months
I’m sure this has been discussed in Apple’s board meetings. People don’t like change. Users would stop using Logic and Final Cut in protest, and continuing users will be left with a sour taste in their mouth. Some would stop using Apple products all together!

Final Cut is Apple’s direct competition with Adobe, but Apple makes their money largely from hardware, App Store fees, and platform lock-in. Their current pricing isn’t outrageous for a casual or adventurous user to purchase and furthers their lock-in to the Apple ecosystem, meanwhile professionals will purchase Apple’s expensive hardware upgrades, this also advances Apple further into the zeitgeist of professional video and music software and anyone looking to get into the hobby will heavily consider Apple against the alternatives.

By @armchairhacker - about 2 months
IMO the most logical pricing for continuously-updating, offline software is paid updates. Or “subscription-based, but you get to keep the old version without renewing the subscription” which is the same as paid updates but modern and auto-renews. For example, this is what Jetbrains does.

Businesses need money to keep updating the software, and won’t get it if all their customers have already bought the product. On the other hand, if something is offline and paid for, it should never go away.

Online is different, because customers need to continuously pay for hosting and compute. If it’s an app that’s almost all client side and the business just makes it online to force users to subscribe…yeah that’s wrong. But obviously something like a VPS is going to be a subscription.

By @ksec - about 2 months
I think it is more acquire-Hire rather than anything else. Their products are so good, rather than risking losing them due to potentially some buy-out Apple will just bring them in-house.
By @saaaaaam - about 2 months
They won’t introduce this subscription bundle.

What they will do is introduce Apple One Premier+ : includes Apple Music, Apple TV+, Apple Fitness+ […] and all your creator tools including Final Cut Pro, Pixelmator, Photomator, Logic Pro […]

If you’re already paying $40 or whatever for Apple One Premier it’s a very short step to $65 for Premier+

I pay for Apple One Premier. Would I pay for Apple One Prmeier+?

Almost certainly.

By @n144q - about 2 months
Repeating what I said in the other thread -- unless Apple is open to release Pixelmator on Windows and/or the web, it's not going to compete with Adobe CC. ok, maybe the users that exclusively work on Mac. But that's nowhere a replacement for Adobe CC.
By @newsclues - about 2 months
Apple might go for subscription services for pro apps, but probably not the consumer versions.
By @whycome - about 2 months
What are the reasons Apple might stick with the one-time-fee model for Logic and Final Cut Pro? (What are the advantages? Even if those advantages might just be for goodwill with their existing (pro)consumer base.)

(Not rhetorical here -- I'm genuinely curious)

By @TheAtomic - about 2 months
Definitely follow the lead of one of the most reviled companies going.
By @sgjohnson - about 2 months
If that was the case, perhaps they should have bought Affinity instead?