January 13th, 2025

Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation

Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation is a key textbook on photorealistic graphics, integrating theory and practice, featuring GPU ray tracing, and available for free online.

Read original articleLink Icon
Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation

Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation, authored by Matt Pharr, Wenzel Jakob, and Greg Humphreys, is a comprehensive textbook that explores the principles and practical applications of photorealistic computer graphics. The updated edition emphasizes physically based rendering techniques, which accurately model light scattering to achieve visual realism and predictability in image synthesis. The book integrates mathematical theory with practical implementation, utilizing a literate programming approach that combines documentation and source code for enhanced understanding. It includes advanced algorithms and new content on GPU ray tracing, enabling readers to develop sophisticated rendering systems. The authors received a 2014 Academy Award for Scientific and Technical Achievement for their contributions to the field, with the book recognized as a crucial resource for physically based shading and lighting in film production. Donald Knuth praised the work, suggesting it deserves a Pulitzer Prize. Both the third and fourth editions of the book are available for free online, making this essential text accessible to a wider audience interested in the future of real-time graphics.

- The book focuses on physically based rendering techniques for photorealistic graphics.

- It combines mathematical theory with practical implementation for better understanding.

- The authors received an Academy Award for their contributions to the field.

- The book includes new material on GPU ray tracing.

- Both editions are freely available online for broader accessibility.

Link Icon 8 comments
By @crispyambulance - 1 day
Every time I see stuff like this it makes me think about optical design software.

There are applications (Zemax, for example) that are used to design optical systems (lens arrangements for cameras, etc). These applications are eye-wateringly expensive-- like similar in pricing to top-class EDA software licenses.

With the abundance GPU's and modern UI's, I wonder how much work would be involved for someone to make optical design software that blows away the old tools. It would be ray-tracing, but with interesting complications like accounting for polarization, diffraction, scattering, fluorescence, media effects beyond refraction like like birefringence and stuff like Kerr and Pockels, etc.

By @timeforcomputer - about 22 hours
I love this book so much. The literate programming style I think inspired from Knuth's cweb, great writing, beautiful high-quality physical book worth buying but also free access to knowledge. The literate-programming style means you are almost immediately applying theory to a practical system, I keep having to take breaks to learn outside math/physics though, but it is self-contained in principle I think.
By @losvedir - about 24 hours
All right, off topic but I've seen this a bunch lately and the term just really irritates my brain for some reason. What's its origin? "[adverb] based" just feels so wrong to me. Shouldn't that be a noun: "Evidence-based medicine", "values-based", "faith-based", etc. Does "physically based" bother anyone else?
By @taeric - 1 day
This and https://hint.userweb.mwn.de/understanding_mp3/index.html are both amazingly fun examples of literate programming that I recommend all of the time.
By @magicalhippo - 1 day
I've mentioned it before, but this book is amazing in the way it covers both the theory in detail, as well as the implementation.

There's often a lot of details that matter when implementing something efficiently and well which the theory either hides or is a result of our hardware limitations like floating point numbers.

Almost all other programming books I've read cover either the theory in detail and gloss over the implementation details, or goes into a lot of implementation stuff but only cover the easy parts and doesn't give you a good indication of how to deal with the advanced stuff.

So, any other books out there that you've read that is like PBR?

By @keyle - about 22 hours
off topic: I live in this strange world where I can read the code and understand what it does, regardless of the language(!)

but the algorithm for the theory looks approximately like this to me

    (ijfio) $@ * foiew(qwdrg) awep2-2lahl [1]
Is there a good book that goes FROM programmer TO math-wizardry that you would recommend, without falling into the textbooks? Ideally I'd like to be able to read them and turn them into pseudocode, or I can't follow.

[1]: e.g. https://pbr-book.org/4ed/Introduction/Photorealistic_Renderi...

By @phkahler - 1 day
Is there a standard OpenGL (ES3) shader I can drop in a GPLed application that uses a decent (is there a standard?) BRDF similar to Schlick with red,green,blue, and roughness?

I've wanted to add this capability to Solvespace for a while. I did my own implementation with the Fresnel term and it looked OK, but I want something "standard" and correct.

By @amelius - 1 day
Why don't they link to the physical book?