January 28th, 2025

Trump administration halts proposed EPA limits on PFAS pollution

President Trump has withdrawn a proposed rule to limit PFAS discharges, raising concerns about public health and environmental protections, while the EPA identified over 120,000 PFAS exposure sites.

Read original articleLink Icon
Trump administration halts proposed EPA limits on PFAS pollution

In a series of policy reversals, President Donald Trump has withdrawn a proposed rule aimed at limiting toxic PFAS chemicals in industrial wastewater. This draft rule, which was under review by the White House, was intended to reduce discharges of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), known for their association with various health issues. Critics, including environmental groups, have condemned the withdrawal as a move that favors the chemical industry and exacerbates the ongoing PFAS contamination crisis in the U.S. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified over 120,000 sites where exposure to PFAS may occur, and the withdrawal of the rule is seen as a significant setback in establishing federal standards. Alongside this decision, Trump has issued executive orders freezing new federal regulations and reversing several environmental policies from the previous administration, including those related to climate change and energy production. Environmental advocates have expressed concern that these actions undermine public health and environmental protections, while the EPA has defended the moves as standard transition procedures. The situation has raised questions about the administration's authority to implement such changes and the potential long-term impacts on environmental regulations.

- Trump has withdrawn a proposed rule to limit PFAS discharges, favoring the chemical industry.

- The EPA has identified over 120,000 sites at risk for PFAS exposure.

- Critics argue the withdrawal exacerbates the PFAS contamination crisis and undermines public health.

- Trump's administration is reversing multiple environmental policies from the previous administration.

- Concerns have been raised about the authority and implications of these executive actions.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @Havoc - 2 months
Where does this guy even get so many bad ideas?
By @threecheese - 2 months
But isn’t this making the frogs gay? I thought there was a frog mandate?

But seriously, it is unclear from TFA whether this is a withdrawal (signal) or just part of the promised bulk pause for review (noise).