People Are Going Silent': Fearing Retribution, Trump Critics Muzzle Themselves
Critics of Trump are increasingly silent due to fears of retribution, impacting political discourse and raising concerns about authoritarianism, as public figures prioritize safety and institutional stability over vocal opposition.
Read original articleIn the wake of President Trump's second administration, a notable silence has emerged among critics, driven by fears of retribution. Individuals from various sectors, including federal employees, university leaders, and business executives, express concerns about online attacks, potential harm to their businesses, and threats to their families. This atmosphere of intimidation has led many to avoid public criticism of Trump, even as he signals a willingness to retaliate against dissenters. Prominent figures, including Republican senators, have altered their stances or refrained from commenting on contentious issues, fearing primary challenges or backlash from Trump's supporters. Experts warn that this behavior reflects a troubling trend towards authoritarianism, as societal actors modify their behavior to evade government wrath. While some, like Michael Roth, president of Wesleyan University, openly criticize the administration's tactics, many remain silent, prioritizing institutional stability over vocal opposition. The chilling effect extends to both parties, with some Democrats also hesitating to confront Trump due to fears of personal safety. The situation raises concerns about the health of political discourse and the potential erosion of democratic norms, as individuals weigh the risks of speaking out against a powerful political figure and his allies.
- Critics of Trump are increasingly silent due to fears of retribution.
- Many public figures are concerned about personal safety and business repercussions.
- Experts warn of a shift towards authoritarianism in political discourse.
- Some individuals, like university presidents, choose to remain silent to protect their institutions.
- The chilling effect affects both Republicans and Democrats, stifling open debate.
Related
Anticipatory Obedience and the Media
The article examines Donald Trump's media strategy, likening it to Viktor Orbán's, highlighting a chilling effect on journalism and a shift towards compliance among major media outlets, threatening democratic integrity.
LA Times, MSNBC, WaPo staff fear execs made editorial decisions to appease Trump
Discussions among U.S. journalists reveal concerns about self-censorship related to Trump, with resignations at the Los Angeles Times, delayed NBC documentaries, and the Washington Post's uncertain endorsement process.
Don't Panic: there's a narcissism in thinking you live in the worst of times
Freddie deBoer discusses potential negative consequences of Trump's reelection, including policy rollbacks and military conflict, while cautioning against liberal panic and emphasizing the need for a measured perspective.
Concerns About White House/Tech Collusion Have Disappeared with Elon's Ascension
The article critiques commentators who shifted from warning about government collusion with social media to supporting Musk and Trump, revealing a double standard driven by political alignment rather than principle.
The Faux Free Speech Warriors Attacking Free Speech
Powerful figures in America manipulate free speech rhetoric for censorship, using legal intimidation like SLAPPs to silence critics, threatening media reporting, and undermining democracy, necessitating stronger anti-SLAPP laws.
> a guy walked up on me and said to me, “Leave Trump alone. Forget the story.” And then he leaned around and looked at my daughter and said, “That’s a beautiful little girl. It’d be a shame if something happened to her mom.”
An article about it thought it sounded outlandish but found other examples:
> My name is Carmine. I don’t know why you’re fucking with Mr. Trump but if you keep fucking with Mr. Trump, we know where you live and we’re going to your house for your wife and kids.
https://www.vox.com/2018/3/26/17164212/stormy-daniels-trump-...
This is feels very similar.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/11/mitt-ro...
To quote the article, "Some of the reluctance to hold Trump accountable was a function of the same old perverse political incentives—elected Republicans feared a political backlash from their base. But after January 6, a new, more existential brand of cowardice had emerged. One Republican congressman confided to Romney that he wanted to vote for Trump’s second impeachment, but chose not to out of fear for his family’s safety. The congressman reasoned that Trump would be impeached by House Democrats with or without him—why put his wife and children at risk if it wouldn’t change the outcome? Later, during the Senate trial, Romney heard the same calculation while talking with a small group of Republican colleagues. When one senator, a member of leadership, said he was leaning toward voting to convict, the others urged him to reconsider. You can’t do that, Romney recalled someone saying. Think of your personal safety, said another. Think of your children. The senator eventually decided they were right."
That is not a well functioning democracy.
Related
Anticipatory Obedience and the Media
The article examines Donald Trump's media strategy, likening it to Viktor Orbán's, highlighting a chilling effect on journalism and a shift towards compliance among major media outlets, threatening democratic integrity.
LA Times, MSNBC, WaPo staff fear execs made editorial decisions to appease Trump
Discussions among U.S. journalists reveal concerns about self-censorship related to Trump, with resignations at the Los Angeles Times, delayed NBC documentaries, and the Washington Post's uncertain endorsement process.
Don't Panic: there's a narcissism in thinking you live in the worst of times
Freddie deBoer discusses potential negative consequences of Trump's reelection, including policy rollbacks and military conflict, while cautioning against liberal panic and emphasizing the need for a measured perspective.
Concerns About White House/Tech Collusion Have Disappeared with Elon's Ascension
The article critiques commentators who shifted from warning about government collusion with social media to supporting Musk and Trump, revealing a double standard driven by political alignment rather than principle.
The Faux Free Speech Warriors Attacking Free Speech
Powerful figures in America manipulate free speech rhetoric for censorship, using legal intimidation like SLAPPs to silence critics, threatening media reporting, and undermining democracy, necessitating stronger anti-SLAPP laws.