March 9th, 2025

Understanding Transformers (beyond the Math) – kalomaze's kalomazing blog

The blog post explains transformer architecture in language models, highlighting their role as state simulators, the significance of output distributions, and the impact of temperature settings on predictions and adaptability.

Read original articleLink Icon
Understanding Transformers (beyond the Math) – kalomaze's kalomazing blog

The blog post discusses an informal approach to understanding transformer architecture in language models, emphasizing the importance of grasping the broader system rather than just the technical details. The author suggests that transformers function as state simulators, where each prediction has its own state that can change based on new information, rather than following a linear progression. This allows for in-context learning and spontaneity. The output layer is explained as generating distributions of possible next tokens rather than simply predicting the most likely one. The author clarifies misconceptions about temperature settings in token prediction, explaining that lower temperatures sharpen the distribution, leading to potential repetition in outputs. The post also touches on an ASCII art diffusion experiment, illustrating the model's ability to adapt and generate structured outputs from random inputs. Overall, the piece advocates for a more intuitive understanding of transformers, focusing on their capabilities and the underlying principles that govern their operation.

- Transformers act as state simulators, allowing for dynamic predictions based on context.

- The output layer generates distributions of tokens, not just the most likely next token.

- Temperature settings influence the sharpness of token distributions, affecting output variability.

- Understanding transformers requires a focus on their broader functionality rather than just technical details.

- The author shares an ASCII art experiment to demonstrate the model's adaptability and learning process.

Link Icon 1 comments
By @orbital-decay - about 1 month
>Each individual prediction has its own separated state - it's not carried over from the previous one.

>they're completely stateless in their architecture

Wait, what? The basic fact it uses most recently generated tokens to predict the next one (or rather the distribution, not the point) seems to contradict that.