June 23rd, 2024

Fresh water on Earth emerged 500M years earlier than previously thought

Researchers at Curtin University discovered fresh water on Earth around four billion years ago, challenging existing theories. Analysis of ancient crystals suggests landmasses and fresh water played a crucial role in early life emergence. Published in Nature Geoscience.

Read original articleLink Icon
Fresh water on Earth emerged 500M years earlier than previously thought

Researchers at Curtin University have made a groundbreaking discovery regarding the presence of fresh water on Earth. By analyzing ancient crystals from Western Australia's Jack Hills, they have determined that fresh water, crucial for sustaining life, appeared around four billion years ago, much earlier than previously believed. The study, led by Dr. Hamed Gamaleldien and Dr. Hugo Olierook, challenges existing theories about Earth's early history and the presence of oceans. The findings suggest that landmasses and fresh water played a significant role in the emergence of life on Earth within a relatively short timeframe after the planet's formation. This research sheds light on the Earth's early hydrological cycle and provides insights into the conditions that allowed life to flourish. The study, published in the journal Nature Geoscience, marks a significant advancement in understanding Earth's early history and paves the way for further exploration into the origins of life.

Related

Monitoring marine litter from space

Monitoring marine litter from space

A new ESA Discovery study showcased using satellites to monitor marine plastic litter, identifying dense patches in the Mediterranean Sea. Findings offer insights for pollution management and suggest potential for enhanced detection technology.

More evidence against the "ecocide" theory of Easter Island

More evidence against the "ecocide" theory of Easter Island

A study led by archaeologist Carl Lipo challenges Easter Island's collapse narrative, suggesting sustainable population practices. AI analysis estimates lower population capacity, supporting sustainable agriculture theories and resilience against ecocide.

A black hole of inexplicable mass

A black hole of inexplicable mass

The James Webb Space Telescope observed galaxy J1120+0641, revealing a mature quasar with a billion solar mass black hole at cosmic dawn. This challenges theories on black hole growth, suggesting they may start with substantial masses. The study sheds light on early black hole development, showing unexpected normalcy in early quasars, challenging assumptions on their evolution.

Scientists may have found an answer to the mystery of dark matter

Scientists may have found an answer to the mystery of dark matter

Scientists research dark matter, an invisible substance crucial for understanding the universe. Recent studies propose primordial black holes as a solution, suggesting they could account for dark matter and be detected by gravitational wave detectors.

The First Animal Ever Found That Doesn't Need Oxygen to Survive

The First Animal Ever Found That Doesn't Need Oxygen to Survive

Scientists discovered Henneguya salminicola, a jellyfish-like parasite surviving without oxygen inside salmon. This challenges oxygen-dependency beliefs, shedding light on anaerobic metabolism evolution and life's adaptability to extreme conditions.

Link Icon 7 comments
By @setgree - 5 months
Whenever there is research showing that X thing occurred Y years before we previously thought, the big thing we should update on is our confidence intervals. This research pushes back our estimate of freshwater 500M years. What will the next research show?

It’s analogous to finding evidence that humans were in North America 10,000 years before we previously thought, but there is no way we should treat that as a lower bound: https://news.berkeley.edu/2023/10/05/tests-confirm-humans-tr...

By @Symmetry - 5 months
I'm confused by this. When I was blogging about life on Mars[1] I was using a date for the emergence of fresh water on Earth of 4.4 billion years ago(bya)[2]. But this article says the date has been pushed back from 3.5 bya to 4.0 bya.

But reading carefully, it looks like by "fresh water" they means water on land aka rain, not just the existence of seas.

[1]https://hopefullyintersting.blogspot.com/2019/04/how-likely-...

[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Earth

By @JumpCrisscross - 5 months
Silurian hypothesis!

“If an industrial civilization had existed on Earth many millions of years prior to our own era, what traces would it have left and would they be detectable today” [1]?

TL; DR Difficult after ~2.5 million years unless they had a nuclear war.

As for humans: “some specific tracers that would be unique” include “persistent synthetic molecules, plastics and (potentially) very long-lived radioactive fallout in the event of nuclear catastrophe. Absent those markers, the uniqueness of the [Anthropocene] may well be seen in the multitude of relatively independent fingerprints as opposed to a coherent set of changes associated with a single geophysical cause.”

Bonus: “…should any of the initial releases of light carbon described above indeed be related to a prior industrial civilization…these releases often triggered episodes of ocean anoxia (via increased nutrient supply) causing a massive burial of organic matter, which eventually became source strata for further fossil fuels. Thus, the prior industrial activity would have actually given rise to the potential for future industry via their own demise. Large-scale anoxia, in effect, might provide a self-limiting but self-perpetuating feedback of industry on the planet.”

So if we’re going out, we should go all the way and suffocate the oceans out of courtesy.

[1] https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journa...

By @MacrohardDoors - 5 months
I think much of the sea is there because of massive nuclear war millions of years ago which created enormous craters that the water just seeped into and filled up.

I mean, I never thought of it prior to today. But why not.

By @dansafee - 5 months
The margin of error seems to be +/- 500M years on these things. In no other area of "science" has there been such widely innacurate predictions and hypotheses that we are still changing things by millions of years after all this time.