US prosecutors recommend Justice Department criminally charge Boeing
US prosecutors recommend criminal charges against Boeing for violating a settlement related to 737 MAX crashes. Boeing disputes claims, faces potential charges, and negotiates with the Justice Department. Families seek hefty fines and prosecution.
Read original articleUS prosecutors are recommending criminal charges against Boeing for violating a settlement related to two fatal crashes involving the 737 MAX jet. The Justice Department has until July 7 to decide on prosecution. Boeing disputes the violation claim and faces potential charges beyond the initial fraud conspiracy charge. Options include extending the settlement with stricter terms or imposing financial penalties and a compliance monitor. Boeing is wary of a guilty plea due to potential business repercussions. Families of crash victims have criticized the 2021 agreement and urged for a hefty fine and criminal prosecution. Boeing's CEO acknowledged safety shortcomings and apologized to the families. The company's revenue from government contracts could be at risk with a felony conviction. The situation remains fluid as discussions between Boeing and the Justice Department continue, with no final decisions made yet.
Related
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data protection concerns. Legal disputes continue as ByteDance faces pressure to sell TikTok's US assets by January to avoid a ban.
Amazon retaliated after employee walkout over the return-to-office policyholders
The NLRB filed a complaint against Amazon for allegedly firing an employee involved in organizing walkouts against the return-to-office policy. Amazon denies claims, citing underperformance. NLRB seeks remedies. Hearing set for February 4th.
Apple found in breach of EU competition rules
Apple breached EU competition rules by not complying with the Digital Markets Act, hindering app developers from directing consumers to alternative channels. The company faces fines if not compliant within 12 months.
EU Accuses Apple App Store Steering Rules of Violating DMA, Opens Investigation
The European Commission accuses Apple of Digital Markets Act violations related to App Store policies, anti-steering rules, and excessive fees. Apple claims compliance with the law. Investigation ongoing, potential fines pending.
Apple is first company charged with violating EU's DMA rules
Apple is the first company charged under the EU's Digital Markets Act for App Store policies hindering competition. Investigations focus on fees, alternative app stores, and compliance changes. EU aims to prevent anti-competitive practices.
Current stock owners will loose half their value (which is a good enough punishment for this lack of oversight), the state will have access to privileged company information which will allow the prosecution of human responsibles, top executives will be sacked (and their comp reduced by half since their comp is in stocks) and maybe the company will start on good base again.
And no, unfortunately this is not a tinfoil hat view. There is a long history of Boeing getting away with murder already.
> Under the 2021 deal, the Justice Department agreed not to prosecute Boeing over allegations it defrauded the Federal Aviation Administration so long as the company overhauled its compliance practices and submitted regular reports.
So, if they want to prosecute, I'm assuming it's because Boeing didn't adequately overhaul its compliance practices or that it didn't submit regular (or truthful) reports. But what are the specifics of how they failed?
I also get frustrated reading these comments here, which are basically "Boeing bad, they only care about execs and shareholders, they ruined their engineering culture." I agree with all of that , but when the government wants to criminally charge someone or a company, they need some specifics (i.e. fraud). It's not enough to just say they had a lax culture or valued profits over safety. Again, to emphasize, not saying that's the case here, I just don't understand how folks can form an opinion on criminal prosecution without even knowing what specific charges are being proposed.
Keep in mind the whole “certify your own stuff” that contributed towards the Boeing mess is a US gov plan
It used to be that companies existed to transfer value to shareholders by doing something. In the case of Boeing it was making airplanes. They build you an airplane, you pay them for it, they had a list of rules to play by in order to reduce the costs of making that plane in order to make a profit.
Boeing's incentives are to transfer as much value as humanly possible to its shareholders. They've made sure that large parts of their C-Suite, managers, executives, etc. are in on this by giving them shares.
Those people have decided they don't want to play by the rules anymore. There's little incentive for them not to. If the Biden administration gets voted out in November, most of these regulatory and law enforcement pushes you've seen here of late (Adobe, TicketMaster, etc.) are going to go away because the people in charge at companies like Boeing have participated in regulatory capture. Thus, there are no more rules.
You have to start throwing those people in prison (or worse) for the rest of their lives and make compensation in unrealized gains illegal if you want this to stop.
There is more to the rot in this company than just domestic customers falling out of the sky.
I would wager that there is a great deal of actual, very real misanthropy throughout the executive structure.
so much of US flight infrastructure is based around boeing and they're literally falling apart in the sky
nasa wanted competition with spacex so badly that they've pushed boeing to strand two of their astronauts in space
companies that fail due to inherent internal structural and corruption issues need to be broken down and sold off, but we can't even do that because the US is somehow reliant on it
why must we write out our own downfall through corruption with failing companies? i bet there's thousands of upstarts that would take 1/1000th the funding given to boeing for a lot of their important projects that would come up with genuinely innovative solutions to problems we never knew we had if there were actual competition in aerospace
Under the 2021 deal, the Justice Department agreed not to prosecute Boeing over allegations it defrauded the Federal Aviation Administration so long as the company overhauled its compliance practices and submitted regular reports. Boeing also agreed to pay $2.5 billion to settle the investigation"
The 2.5 billion sound like a bribe to me, to avoid criminal charges. And Boeing thought that was enough, but it seems they did not assume that the FAA was also serious, that they still need to "overhaul its compliance practices and submitted regular reports".
edit: we are talking about potential manslaughter in hundreds of cases here, because this is what a criminal investigation could lead to, not a fine for violating arbitary regulations
Related
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data protection concerns. Legal disputes continue as ByteDance faces pressure to sell TikTok's US assets by January to avoid a ban.
Amazon retaliated after employee walkout over the return-to-office policyholders
The NLRB filed a complaint against Amazon for allegedly firing an employee involved in organizing walkouts against the return-to-office policy. Amazon denies claims, citing underperformance. NLRB seeks remedies. Hearing set for February 4th.
Apple found in breach of EU competition rules
Apple breached EU competition rules by not complying with the Digital Markets Act, hindering app developers from directing consumers to alternative channels. The company faces fines if not compliant within 12 months.
EU Accuses Apple App Store Steering Rules of Violating DMA, Opens Investigation
The European Commission accuses Apple of Digital Markets Act violations related to App Store policies, anti-steering rules, and excessive fees. Apple claims compliance with the law. Investigation ongoing, potential fines pending.
Apple is first company charged with violating EU's DMA rules
Apple is the first company charged under the EU's Digital Markets Act for App Store policies hindering competition. Investigations focus on fees, alternative app stores, and compliance changes. EU aims to prevent anti-competitive practices.