June 28th, 2024

Apple crippled watchOS to corner heart-tracking market, doctors say

A group of heart doctors accuses Apple of intentionally limiting heart monitoring capabilities on the Apple Watch to stifle competition. They support AliveCor's appeal, stressing the significance of continuous heart monitoring in healthcare.

Read original articleLink Icon
Apple crippled watchOS to corner heart-tracking market, doctors say

A group of heart doctors has filed an amicus brief with the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, claiming that Apple intentionally degraded the heart monitoring capabilities of the Apple Watch to limit competition in the health-tracking market. The doctors argue that changes made in watchOS 5, specifically replacing the Heart Rate Path Optimizer with a Heart Rate Neural Network and Irregular Rhythm Notifications, resulted in a loss of access to critical heart-rate data for third-party apps like AliveCor's SmartRhythm. This move allegedly hindered continuous heart monitoring and could potentially lead to missed signs of health issues like strokes. The doctors assert that Apple's changes were anticompetitive and negatively impacted healthcare monitoring. Despite a previous dismissal of an antitrust case against Apple related to these changes, the doctors are supporting AliveCor's appeal, emphasizing the importance of continuous heart monitoring for patient care. The ongoing legal battles between Apple and AliveCor involve multiple lawsuits and patent disputes, highlighting the complexities of competition in the wearable health technology sector.

Related

European Union regulators accuse Apple of breaching the bloc's tech rules

European Union regulators accuse Apple of breaching the bloc's tech rules

EU accuses Apple of Digital Markets Act violations for restricting App Store alternatives and charging high developer fees. New probe initiated on contractual terms. Apple defends changes, faces potential fines up to 10%.

Apple found in breach of EU competition rules

Apple found in breach of EU competition rules

Apple breached EU competition rules by not complying with the Digital Markets Act, hindering app developers from directing consumers to alternative channels. The company faces fines if not compliant within 12 months.

EU Accuses Apple App Store Steering Rules of Violating DMA, Opens Investigation

EU Accuses Apple App Store Steering Rules of Violating DMA, Opens Investigation

The European Commission accuses Apple of Digital Markets Act violations related to App Store policies, anti-steering rules, and excessive fees. Apple claims compliance with the law. Investigation ongoing, potential fines pending.

Apple is first company charged with violating EU's DMA rules

Apple is first company charged with violating EU's DMA rules

Apple is the first company charged under the EU's Digital Markets Act for App Store policies hindering competition. Investigations focus on fees, alternative app stores, and compliance changes. EU aims to prevent anti-competitive practices.

Apple admits its AirPods had a security problem

Apple admits its AirPods had a security problem

Apple addressed security vulnerabilities in AirPods and Beats Fit Pro headphones, preventing hackers from pairing devices with the wrong source. The company released updates to enhance customer protection, emphasizing privacy. Apple prioritizes privacy in its products, like Apple Intelligence, and declined AI collaborations with Meta over privacy concerns.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @nerdjon - 7 months
I feel like there are some really important details about this missing.

First off, are there really a loss of sales of heart monitors because of this? I would think that the only people who had real time heart monitors are those that were given it by a doctor and that would not change with the apple watch given the FDA clearance.

I know for myself, I have no need for a monitor all the time so the apple watch doing anything is a bonus since its nothing or the apple watch at this current time with my health.

It would also be helpful to know why apple made this change in the first place. That is entirely glossed over by the article. Even trying to google this topic the best I can find is that apple believes the new algorithm is better.

By @sircastor - 7 months
My suspicion is that Apple switched monitoring types to better manage battery life and to continue to walk the fine line of the Apple Watch not actually being a health device (from an FDA perspective)
By @iamkonstantin - 7 months
Given Apple's sizeable chunk of the market, it makes sense to give 3rd party developers programmatic access to certain platform features. This way, changes to Apple's own apps wouldn't be so impactful, and they can continue to innovate in parallel.
By @jdelman - 7 months
It's very funny that The Register still calls Apple "the iGiant" and the "the iMaker".