June 28th, 2024

So Now the Feds Will Monitor Research Integrity?

The Biden administration forms a Scientific Integrity Task Force to monitor research integrity. Critics express concerns over proposed rule changes, citing persistent research misconduct issues amid increased government funding in universities.

Read original articleLink Icon
So Now the Feds Will Monitor Research Integrity?

The Biden administration established a Scientific Integrity Task Force to oversee federally funded research and ensure scientific integrity. Critics, including research universities and integrity officers, have raised concerns about the proposed rule changes. Despite existing bodies like the Office of Research Integrity and the National Science Foundation monitoring research misconduct, issues persist, with thousands of retractions and cases of misconduct reported annually. The influx of government funding into university research has led to a shift in the science ecosystem, incentivizing misconduct through pressure to secure grants and publish prolifically. The culture of science has evolved from small-scale, discovery-driven research to a larger system focused on capturing research funds. The conflict between the federal task force and university groups reflects differing interests in enforcing scientific integrity. The move towards federal oversight of university science is criticized for potentially undermining the role of scientists as custodians of integrity. The complex interplay of actors, including universities, federal agencies, and Congress, highlights the challenges in addressing scientific integrity issues effectively.

Related

The case for criminalizing scientific misconduct · Chris Said

The case for criminalizing scientific misconduct · Chris Said

The article argues for criminalizing scientific misconduct, citing cases like Sylvain Lesné's fake research. It proposes Danish-style committees and federal laws to address misconduct effectively, emphasizing accountability and public trust protection.

I Study Disinformation. This Election Will Be Grim.

I Study Disinformation. This Election Will Be Grim.

Renée DiResta warns about the surge in election disinformation in the US, fueled by false claims of the 2020 election being stolen. She stresses the need to combat misinformation despite facing backlash and threats. The Stanford Internet Observatory had to adjust its focus due to pressures.

Supreme Court rules that the SEC's in-house rulings violate US constitution

Supreme Court rules that the SEC's in-house rulings violate US constitution

The US Supreme Court ruled SEC's in-house proceedings violate jury trial rights, impacting fraud fighting. Decision criticized, SEC loses tool. Trend limits regulators' power, sparks debate on agency-judiciary balance.

Professor Charged for Operating Multimillion-Dollar Grant Fraud Scheme

Professor Charged for Operating Multimillion-Dollar Grant Fraud Scheme

A Pennsylvania medical professor, Hoau-Yan Wang, faces indictment for allegedly defrauding the NIH of $16 million in grant funds by fabricating data for Alzheimer's research. Charges include major fraud and carry up to 20-year prison sentences.

What SCOTUS just did to broadband, right to repair, the environment, and more

What SCOTUS just did to broadband, right to repair, the environment, and more

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Chevron deference affects net neutrality, climate regulations, and consumer protections. This ruling challenges agency authority, potentially leading to more legal challenges and regulatory obstacles.

Link Icon 0 comments