What SCOTUS just did to broadband, right to repair, the environment, and more

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Chevron deference has significant implications for the administrative state, impacting areas such as net neutrality, climate change regulations, and consumer protections. This ruling challenges the longstanding practice of deferring to federal agencies in interpreting ambiguous legislation, potentially leading to more judicial scrutiny of agency rules. The FCC's efforts to reinstate net neutrality and regulate broadband may face obstacles without Chevron deference, with experts predicting a higher likelihood of legal challenges and regulatory setbacks. Additionally, the EPA's ability to craft environmental protections and combat climate change could be hindered by this decision, as it limits the agency's regulatory authority. The push to regulate Big Tech and ensure competition in digital markets may also face challenges following the overturning of Chevron deference. Overall, the impact of this ruling on various aspects of governance and regulation remains to be fully realized, with potential far-reaching consequences for future policy decisions and legal battles.