Agnotology
Agnotology studies deliberate induced ignorance to manipulate opinions and gain benefits through misinformation. Examples include tobacco and fossil fuel industries spreading doubt. Stanford's Robert N. Proctor highlights powerful interests perpetuating ignorance for agendas.
Read original articleAgnotology is the study of deliberate, culturally induced ignorance or doubt, often used to sell products, influence opinions, or gain favor by spreading inaccurate or misleading information. This concept encompasses situations where more knowledge leads to greater uncertainty. Examples include the tobacco industry's efforts to cast doubt on the health risks of smoking and the fossil fuel industry's campaign against climate change science. Stanford University professor Robert N. Proctor and others have highlighted how powerful interests use various means, such as media, corporations, and government agencies, to perpetuate ignorance. Agnotology also explores why certain knowledge is ignored or delayed, like the suppression of information about plate tectonics due to military secrecy. The term was coined in 1992 by Iain Boal and has since evolved to examine the political and social dimensions of ignorance. Overall, agnotology sheds light on how misinformation is created and perpetuated to serve specific agendas, impacting public understanding and decision-making processes.
Related
Stages of Argument (2000)
Peter Suber, a philosophy professor, defines four stages of argument sophistication in ethical and political discourse. Progressing from dogmatism to responsive two-sided arguments at Stage 4 fosters critical thinking and genuine inquiry.
Nobody knows what's going on
Misinformation's impact on beliefs, reliance on unreliable sources, and human tendency to trust comforting information are discussed. Difficulty in discerning truth and consequences of widespread misinformation are highlighted.
An Anatomy of Algorithm Aversion
The study delves into algorithm aversion, where people favor human judgment over algorithms despite their superior performance. Factors include agency desire, emotional reactions, and ignorance. Addressing these could enhance algorithm acceptance.
The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.
The rise of academentia: Mere transgression being elevated above genuine insight
The article discusses "academentia" in academia, critiquing the rise of queering, fear of questioning, persecution of feminists, and genderism over feminism. It emphasizes intellectual rigor and calls for integrity in academic discourse.
Related
Stages of Argument (2000)
Peter Suber, a philosophy professor, defines four stages of argument sophistication in ethical and political discourse. Progressing from dogmatism to responsive two-sided arguments at Stage 4 fosters critical thinking and genuine inquiry.
Nobody knows what's going on
Misinformation's impact on beliefs, reliance on unreliable sources, and human tendency to trust comforting information are discussed. Difficulty in discerning truth and consequences of widespread misinformation are highlighted.
An Anatomy of Algorithm Aversion
The study delves into algorithm aversion, where people favor human judgment over algorithms despite their superior performance. Factors include agency desire, emotional reactions, and ignorance. Addressing these could enhance algorithm acceptance.
The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.
The rise of academentia: Mere transgression being elevated above genuine insight
The article discusses "academentia" in academia, critiquing the rise of queering, fear of questioning, persecution of feminists, and genderism over feminism. It emphasizes intellectual rigor and calls for integrity in academic discourse.