June 30th, 2024

NASA and SpaceX misjudged the risks from reentering space junk

NASA and SpaceX face challenges with space junk reentries, prompting concerns as debris lands on Earth. Engineers stress the need for more research to manage risks effectively and adapt to new materials.

Read original articleLink Icon
NASA and SpaceX misjudged the risks from reentering space junk

NASA and SpaceX have underestimated the risks associated with reentering space junk, leading to incidents where debris survived reentry and landed on Earth. Landowners have found pieces of space junk linked to missions supporting the International Space Station, raising concerns about uncontrolled reentries. Engineers emphasize the need for more research into spacecraft reentries as more objects are launched into space. The Aerospace Corporation highlights the urgency to understand the process better to adapt to new materials and operational approaches quickly. While controlled reentries over remote ocean areas are ideal, they are often costly due to the need for extra fuel. Recent incidents include space junk damaging property in Florida and North Carolina, with debris from SpaceX Dragon capsules found in various locations. NASA and SpaceX are working to retrieve debris and address the challenges posed by uncontrolled reentries. These events underscore the growing issue of space debris and the importance of mitigating risks associated with reentering objects from space.

Related

SpaceX to deliver vehicle to deorbit International Space Station

SpaceX to deliver vehicle to deorbit International Space Station

NASA chose SpaceX to create the U.S. Deorbit Vehicle for the ISS, ensuring a safe disposal after its 2030 lifespan. The $843 million contract supports NASA's space exploration goals.

SpaceX building NASA craft to destroy the International Space Station

SpaceX building NASA craft to destroy the International Space Station

SpaceX secures an $843 million NASA contract to construct the "U.S. Deorbit Vehicle" for the intentional destruction of the ISS in 2030. NASA plans to replace the ISS with private space stations.

Astronauts take shelter in Starliner, other spacecraft after satellite breakup

Astronauts take shelter in Starliner, other spacecraft after satellite breakup

Nine astronauts aboard the International Space Station sought shelter in their return spacecraft after a satellite breakup. Safety ensured, operations resumed, highlighting concerns about space debris. Plans for Starliner pending review.

ISS Astronauts Take Shelter After Russian Spacecraft Breaks Up in Orbit

ISS Astronauts Take Shelter After Russian Spacecraft Breaks Up in Orbit

Nine astronauts on the International Space Station sought shelter after a Russian satellite fragmented in orbit. Debris weighing 13,000 pounds was released, but the ISS remained safe as the cloud is expected to burn up harmlessly. LeoLabs monitors for further risks.

The environmental cost of rocket launches

The environmental cost of rocket launches

Space launches, including SpaceX's Starship, raise environmental concerns. The explosion at Boca Chica, Texas, scattered debris up to 10km away, prompting worries about environmental impact. Conservation groups advocate for stricter measures. NASA monitors launch impacts, while the European Space Agency's spaceport in French Guiana aims to minimize environmental impact.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @j_not_j - 5 months
Risk is about probabilities and hazards.

This article is about absolutes and fear. To conflate the two is an obvious rhetorical trick that amounts to clickbait, approximately.

"It's rare for a reentering object to hit a structure..." which is an example of the probability and the hazard. So the risk by most people's definition is "low".

So what's the problem? "According to the European Space Agency, the annual risk..." is the problem. Misusing (or misunderstanding) terminology is typical. Unfortunately, typical for Ars.

By @foxhop - 5 months
By @basisword - 5 months
[deleted]
By @ck2 - 5 months
Yeah sure "misjudged"

Privatize the profits, socialize the disaster.

Rocket launches have serious environment costs too.