July 2nd, 2024

In 1962, "Starfish Prime" space nuke destroyed 1/3rd of LEO satellites

The US and Japan advocate a UN resolution to enforce the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, aiming to ban nuclear weapons in space due to concerns over Russia's activities. Upholding the treaty is crucial for global security.

Read original articleLink Icon
In 1962, "Starfish Prime" space nuke destroyed 1/3rd of LEO satellites

The US and Japan are pushing for a UN Security Council resolution to uphold the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, prohibiting nuclear weapons in space amid concerns about Russia's potential development of such weapons. The treaty emerged from past nuclear tests like Starfish Prime in 1962, which caused significant damage to satellites and infrastructure on Earth. With the current reliance on satellites for various essential services, the impact of a nuclear attack in space would be devastating globally. The potential targeting of satellite constellations like SpaceX's Starlink poses risks not only to space infrastructure but also to life on Earth, especially in vulnerable regions. Deploying nuclear weapons in space is deemed to have no military value and would lead to indiscriminate dangers. Experts emphasize the importance of upholding international commitments like the Outer Space Treaty to prevent catastrophic consequences and maintain global security.

Related

Astronauts take shelter in Starliner, other spacecraft after satellite breakup

Astronauts take shelter in Starliner, other spacecraft after satellite breakup

Nine astronauts aboard the International Space Station sought shelter in their return spacecraft after a satellite breakup. Safety ensured, operations resumed, highlighting concerns about space debris. Plans for Starliner pending review.

ISS Astronauts take cover as defunct Russian satellite splits into 180 pieces

ISS Astronauts take cover as defunct Russian satellite splits into 180 pieces

A defunct Russian satellite, Resurs-P1, broke up into nearly 200 debris pieces near the International Space Station. US astronauts sought shelter briefly. Space Command confirmed no immediate threat. Concerns arise about space junk management.

ISS Astronauts Take Shelter After Russian Spacecraft Breaks Up in Orbit

ISS Astronauts Take Shelter After Russian Spacecraft Breaks Up in Orbit

Nine astronauts on the International Space Station sought shelter after a Russian satellite fragmented in orbit. Debris weighing 13,000 pounds was released, but the ISS remained safe as the cloud is expected to burn up harmlessly. LeoLabs monitors for further risks.

The environmental cost of rocket launches

The environmental cost of rocket launches

Space launches, including SpaceX's Starship, raise environmental concerns. The explosion at Boca Chica, Texas, scattered debris up to 10km away, prompting worries about environmental impact. Conservation groups advocate for stricter measures. NASA monitors launch impacts, while the European Space Agency's spaceport in French Guiana aims to minimize environmental impact.

NASA and SpaceX misjudged the risks from reentering space junk

NASA and SpaceX misjudged the risks from reentering space junk

NASA and SpaceX face challenges with space junk reentries, prompting concerns as debris lands on Earth. Engineers stress the need for more research to manage risks effectively and adapt to new materials.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @buildbot - 4 months
I'm curious - did the people testing space nuclear weapons predict the intense effects? AKA killing 7 satellites and more impressively to me, causing an aurora seen from New Zealand to Hawaii (!!!).
By @tivert - 4 months
1/3 sounds big, the the event happened in 1962, so the actual number was probably something like 2 or 3 total.
By @pimlottc - 4 months
It’s weird that in this entire article, it doesn’t actually say which nation launched Starfish Prime.
By @anovikov - 4 months
"Destroyed by radiation" after 4 months is a bad joke. Virtually all radioactivity produced has decayed by then, so if something wasn't kicked out in the first hours and days, it will be safe later.

Long-term disruptions in the Earth's magnetic field resulting from explosion, effectively exposing satellites to space radiation as if they were in the Van Allen belt instead of LEO, could do that. But certainly not the radioactivity produced by the explosion proper. It probably didn't have any impact on anything, either short or long term. Certainly not on satellites.