The Perpetual Quest for a Truth Machine
Historical pursuit of truth machines dates back to Ramon Llull in the 13th century, evolving through Leibniz, Boole, and Shannon. Modern language models like ChatGPT continue this quest for automated certainty.
Read original article
The article discusses the historical quest for truth machines, starting with Ramon Llull in the 13th century, who aimed to create a logic machine to prove the existence of God. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and George Boole also contributed to this idea, with Boole pioneering a new form of logic based on yes or no answers. Claude Shannon later applied Boolean logic to optimize telephone switch routing, laying the foundation for modern computing. Shannon's work led to the use of zeros and ones in digital technology. The article also mentions the development of language models like ChatGPT, which can mimic human language patterns and provide instant responses to various queries. Overall, the historical pursuit of truth machines reflects a longstanding human desire for automated certainty and rational truth beyond human fallibility.
Related
The origins of ELIZA, the first chatbot
The paper delves into the origins of ELIZA, the first chatbot by Joseph Weizenbaum in the 1960s. It clarifies misconceptions about its creation, emphasizing its role in AI history and human-machine interaction.
Large Language Models are not a search engine
Large Language Models (LLMs) from Google and Meta generate algorithmic content, causing nonsensical "hallucinations." Companies struggle to manage errors post-generation due to factors like training data and temperature settings. LLMs aim to improve user interactions but raise skepticism about delivering factual information.
The AI we could have had
In the late 1960s, a secret US lab led by Avery Johnson and Warren Brodey aimed to humanize computing, challenging the industry's focus on predictability. Their legacy underscores missed opportunities for diverse digital cultures.
With fifth busy beaver, researchers approach computation's limits
Researchers led by graduate student Tristan Stérin determined BB(5) as 47,176,870 using Coq software. Busy beavers, introduced by Tibor Radó, explore Turing machines' behavior. Allen Brady's program efficiently analyzes and classifies machines, advancing computational understanding.
The Zombie Misconception of Theoretical Computer Science
The blog post delves into misconceptions in theoretical computer science, focusing on computability and complexity theory. It clarifies the distinction between functions and questions, NP-hard problems, and the P versus NP dilemma. Emphasizing the importance of grasping fundamental principles, the author seeks reader input on combating these misunderstandings.
1 commentsRelated
The origins of ELIZA, the first chatbot
The paper delves into the origins of ELIZA, the first chatbot by Joseph Weizenbaum in the 1960s. It clarifies misconceptions about its creation, emphasizing its role in AI history and human-machine interaction.
Large Language Models are not a search engine
Large Language Models (LLMs) from Google and Meta generate algorithmic content, causing nonsensical "hallucinations." Companies struggle to manage errors post-generation due to factors like training data and temperature settings. LLMs aim to improve user interactions but raise skepticism about delivering factual information.
The AI we could have had
In the late 1960s, a secret US lab led by Avery Johnson and Warren Brodey aimed to humanize computing, challenging the industry's focus on predictability. Their legacy underscores missed opportunities for diverse digital cultures.
With fifth busy beaver, researchers approach computation's limits
Researchers led by graduate student Tristan Stérin determined BB(5) as 47,176,870 using Coq software. Busy beavers, introduced by Tibor Radó, explore Turing machines' behavior. Allen Brady's program efficiently analyzes and classifies machines, advancing computational understanding.
The Zombie Misconception of Theoretical Computer Science
The blog post delves into misconceptions in theoretical computer science, focusing on computability and complexity theory. It clarifies the distinction between functions and questions, NP-hard problems, and the P versus NP dilemma. Emphasizing the importance of grasping fundamental principles, the author seeks reader input on combating these misunderstandings.