July 14th, 2024

US Courts to Decide If NFTs Are Securities as DraftKings Case Goes to Trial

US courts are evaluating if NFTs should be deemed securities in a case involving DraftKings. The lawsuit alleges DraftKings' sports-themed NFTs meet securities criteria, impacting the NFT market and industry diversification.

Read original articleLink Icon
US Courts to Decide If NFTs Are Securities as DraftKings Case Goes to Trial

US courts are set to determine whether NFTs should be classified as securities in a trial involving DraftKings. The case, Dufoe v. DraftKings Inc., alleges that DraftKings' sports-themed NFTs on the Polygon blockchain meet the criteria of the Howey test, potentially categorizing them as securities. The judge denied DraftKings' motion to dismiss the lawsuit, signaling a significant legal battle that could impact the NFT landscape. This development comes at a crucial time for the NFT market, which has experienced a decline in sales volumes in Q2 2024. Despite this, the NFT ecosystem continues to expand into various industries beyond digital art, with applications in sports collectibles, virtual real estate, and digital fashion. The outcome of this trial could have broad implications for how NFTs are regulated and marketed, potentially affecting companies' strategies and financial performance in the future.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @yieldcrv - 9 months
bait. they are to decide if those NFTs were issued in a securities transaction

asset types themselves are not securities and neither a judge or the regulator is trying to decide that. transactions involving those assets can be securities and are tightly regulated.

some assets are standardized and only issued in a specific set of transactions 100% of the time, such that its redundant to call them anything other than securities. for assets that aren't standardized, the sequence of transactions has to be analyzed to determine if that set of transactions constituted a securities transaction.

this can be corroborated by how the courts have been reaching the conclusion that crypto asset's primary market (the initial sell or distribution from the creator to purchasers) has to be treated different from the secondary market trading (where the prices are listed on exchanges and fluctuate all day, everyday, which attracts most headlines and mindshare).

clarity from Congress about what level of consumer and investor protection is desired is what's really lacking here. The "securities" framework doesn't do that.

By @pxeger1 - 9 months
Do famous paintings/artworks count as securities? Some people like to invest in them, and there are lots of “fintech”s offering fine art investment as a service
By @josefritzishere - 9 months
I wouldn't call it bait. That's the nature of case law. If they decide these NFTs are Securities, then given their criteria, other NHTs can be securities. If they use the Howey test then they are also deciding that is the proper test for this scenario. Spoiler: They did decide on the Howey test and also against Draft Kings. https://www.kmllp.com/news/judge-holds-digital-trading-cards...