July 22nd, 2024

Physicist, 98, honoured with doctorate 75 years after groundbreaking discovery

Physicist Rosemary Fowler, aged 98, received an honorary doctorate from the University of Bristol for her 1948 discovery of the kaon particle. Her work under Cecil Powell revolutionized particle physics.

Read original articleLink Icon
RecognitionSkepticismEquality
Physicist, 98, honoured with doctorate 75 years after groundbreaking discovery

Physicist Rosemary Fowler, now 98 years old, was recently honored with an honorary doctorate from the University of Bristol, 75 years after her groundbreaking discovery of the kaon particle during her doctoral research in 1948. Despite not completing her PhD at the time to focus on raising a family, her discovery significantly contributed to the field of particle physics and continues to influence current research, including the prediction of particles like the Higgs boson. Fowler's work under Cecil Powell at Bristol University led to a revolution in particle physics theory. She was commended by the University of Bristol chancellor, Sir Paul Nurse, for her intellectual rigor and curiosity, which paved the way for critical discoveries in physics. Fowler's early achievements in physics, her decision to prioritize family, and subsequent recognition highlight her significant contributions to the field and serve as an inspiration for future generations of physicists.

AI: What people are saying
The article about physicist Rosemary Fowler receiving an honorary doctorate has sparked various discussions.
  • Some commenters criticize the honorary doctorate as a way for universities to boost their numbers or relevance.
  • There is a discussion on the work-life balance in academia, particularly for women, and the sacrifices involved in pursuing a PhD.
  • Commenters appreciate the non-gendered headline, seeing it as a step towards true equality in recognizing achievements.
  • Questions arise about the value and necessity of the traditional PhD system, with some suggesting its abolition could lead to more research and researchers.
  • There is a sentiment that Fowler's recognition is long overdue and well-deserved, despite the slow-moving academic bureaucracy.
Link Icon 14 comments
By @achrono - 9 months
Interesting that The Guardian is leading the way in finally having non-gendered headlines, i.e. not saying "Female physicist recognized 75 years after discovery" or "Rosemary Fowler, 98-year old physicist, recognized 75 years after discovery".

This will hopefully pave the way for truer equality in that the most common reaction reading this headline would probably be "oh no, why has this physicist not gotten the recognition" rather than the latter, which is more polarising -- it leads to either "outrageous, look here is one more neglected woman!" or "here we go, one more feminist complaint".

By @cb321 - 9 months
A perhaps relevant Sabine Hossenfelder video:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKiBlGDfRU8
Although Sabine's video is more about today's academia money/paper mill incentives, she mentions the more eternal work/family-life balance for women that also seems to have been determinative for Rosemary Fowler (the subject of the article).
By @teeheelol - 9 months
Every person I know with a PhD now in their 40s and 50s (7 people) doesn’t have a family and wished they did and didn’t have a PhD. I’d love to see a study on that.

I’m never bothered because it looked like too much effort for little money.

By @shusaku - 9 months
> The year after the discovery, Fowler left university having published her discovery in three academic papers.

Back in the days where two papers in nature wasn’t enough to to instantly get you a PhD I guess! Hopefully she was kept in the loop by her husband (fellow physicist) so she could feel rewarded even in real time.

By @odyssey7 - 9 months
Consider how much more research and researchers we could have if we abolished the whole PhD thing.
By @TwoNineFive - 9 months
> “I haven’t done anything since to deserve special respect.”

She's right.

She left an exploitative disgraceful system who only now grasps for relevancy and respect by seeking to associate itself with those who did the work.

By @tetris11 - 9 months
I'm trying to picture her as a young inquisitive woman, rising to a research challenge and working day/night on the discovery.

But when you see them so old and decrepit, it really hits home just how terrible ageing truly is. It robbed this woman of her vigour. I can't actually imagine the inquisitive expression she must have had on her face during her peak.

By @wslh - 9 months
I read that she received an honorary PhD but surely she fully deserve just a "PhD". Is this a UK thing? Could you in the US or elsewhere have a PhD on the merits of your work (a thesis, a discovery, etc) without spending time in the courses?
By @pvaldes - 9 months
It helps to round up the yearly number of doctorates at the end of the Academy calendar.

Maybe the thesis production was getting a little slow for them this year.

By @aaronsung - 9 months
Well deserved.
By @sandspar - 9 months
You can guess before opening the article.
By @rsynnott - 9 months
I mean, I knew university bureaucracy could move slowly, but this seems excessive :)