July 30th, 2024

Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

A 1590s portrait of King Henry VIII has been identified as missing by art historian Adam Busiakiewicz. It is now at Warwickshire's Museum Collections Centre for further research and potential public display.

Read original articleLink Icon
CuriosityAmazementIntrigue
Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

A portrait of King Henry VIII, dating back to the 1590s, has been identified as a missing artwork after an art historian, Adam Busiakiewicz, spotted it in a photo shared on X (formerly Twitter) by the Warwickshire Lieutenancy. The portrait, which was hanging in the Shire Hall, Warwick, was created for tapestry maker Ralph Sheldon and is part of a collection of 22 portraits, with only a few known to exist. Busiakiewicz, who works for Sotheby's, confirmed the identification after inspecting the piece in person. Following the discovery, Warwickshire County Council moved the artwork to its Museum Collections Centre for further research. Busiakiewicz described the portrait as a "striking" representation of one of England's most famous kings and expressed hope that it would be displayed for public admiration. The history of the portrait's journey remains unclear, but it is known that Sheldon's portraits were previously located at Weston House in Long Compton, Warwickshire, before being sold at auction. While the exact value of this particular piece is unknown, similar works have sold for around £200,000. Local historian Aaron Manning, who assisted Busiakiewicz, emphasized the significance of the portrait as an important addition to Warwick's rich history.

AI: What people are saying
The comments on the article about the rediscovery of King Henry VIII's portrait reveal several key points and themes.
  • Art historians and experts emphasize the skill required to identify such artworks, noting that the average person might overlook important details.
  • Discussion about the painting's provenance, including its connection to Ralph Sheldon and the larger collection of portraits from the 1590s.
  • Questions arise regarding the terminology used to describe the painting's status, with some suggesting "presumed lost to history" is more accurate than "missing."
  • Interest in the Warwickshire Lieutenancy and its role in the context of the painting's rediscovery.
  • Comments reflect on the serendipitous nature of the painting's recovery, highlighting the detective work involved in tracing its history.
Link Icon 16 comments
By @qingcharles - 4 months
When you're an expert at something and you spend all your days looking at these things, you can pick out remarkable details from nothing. Any regular person looking at the original photo (below) would have seen nothing!

https://x.com/Warkslieutenant/status/1808884139585610231/pho...

(it's the picture with the curved frame on the left)

By @bobwolf - 4 months
Apparently was part of a set of 22 portraits commissioned in the 1590s by tapestry maker Ralph Sheldon and not the only one missing.

According to https://adamfineart.wordpress.com/2024/07/04/ralph-sheldons-...

The 1781 sale at Christie’s of the Weston portraits show that the group included portraits of Henry IV, Henry V, Edward IV, Richard III, Henry VII, Queen Elizabeth, Charles V, Prince Arthur, Henry VIII, Francis King of France, Edward VI, Queen Mother of France, Henry of Bourbon, King of France, Cardinal Wolsey, L. Cromwell Earl of Essex, Sir Thomas Moore, Duke of Alva, Comte Eglemont, Duke of Guise, Duke of Parma and the Earl of Essex.

By @arrowsmith - 4 months
Reminds me of the "lost" painting that was rediscovered via the movie Stuart Little:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Little_(film)#Lost_pain...

By @twodave - 4 months
Huh. I share a surname with the original owner (Sheldon) and once researched Henry XIII for a people fair. I think that means I’m the rightful owner…
By @playingalong - 4 months
Is there some list of "missing" artwork some hobby OSINTers could try to find?

Surely this wasn't the first public photo of this painting posted to internet, was it?

By @boomboomsubban - 4 months
Other Sheldon tapestries if you're interested, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Sheldon_Portrait...
By @lupusreal - 4 months
Kind of crazy how the painting ended up so close to where it started.
By @dwighttk - 4 months
Does the bbc have a rule against posting links to Twitter or something?
By @Rebelgecko - 4 months
What is the Warwickshire Lieutenancy? My understanding is it's some sort of royally appointed representative at the county level, but I'm not sure if it's a ceremonial role?
By @Log_out_ - 4 months
The sam2 segmenting model going through all social media scanning for stolwn art.
By @GauntletWizard - 4 months
I think "Missing" is a pretty poor choice of word for this; "Presumed lost to history" would better explain what's happened - Which is both incredible and terribly dull at the same time! Somebody connected the dots on the provenance of a quite old painting that was venerated, but perhaps not as much as it should have been, not far from it's last known location - At least in distance, if not time. Great detective work, and far more interesting than if it'd been lost or stolen and people were looking for it - This was a piece that people knew existed, but nobody was looking for.
By @givinguflac - 4 months
As an aside, I really appreciated the BBC not loading twitter content by default and asking first.

This is pretty amazing that such an offhanded catch led to a recovery of something assumed lost to history though.

By @xeromal - 4 months
Is it common in British English to use "for" instead of "by" when talking about the creator?

''' After inspecting it personally to test his theory, he confirmed the artwork was created *for* tapestry maker Ralph Sheldon and dated back to the 1590s.

It was one of a collection of 22 portraits made *for* Sheldon, but the whereabouts of only a handful were known.

'''

I'm confused whether Sheldon is the painter or the commissioner.