July 31st, 2024

Regular Glucosamine Use and Mortality

A study of 495,077 UK Biobank participants found regular glucosamine use linked to reduced all-cause mortality and specific deaths, suggesting potential health benefits and the need for further research.

Read original articleLink Icon
Regular Glucosamine Use and Mortality

A large prospective cohort study published in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases examined the relationship between regular glucosamine use and mortality rates among 495,077 participants from the UK Biobank, with a mean age of 56.6 years. The study aimed to assess all-cause mortality and specific causes of death, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, respiratory, and digestive diseases. Participants were followed for a median of 8.9 years, during which 19,882 deaths were recorded. At baseline, 19.1% reported regular glucosamine use. The findings indicated that glucosamine use was associated with a 15% reduction in all-cause mortality, an 18% reduction in CVD mortality, a 6% reduction in cancer mortality, a 27% reduction in respiratory mortality, and a 26% reduction in digestive mortality. The protective effects appeared to be more pronounced among current smokers compared to non-smokers. The study suggests that regular glucosamine supplementation may confer significant health benefits, potentially lowering the risk of death from various causes. These results highlight the need for further clinical trials to explore the mechanisms behind these associations and to better understand the potential benefits of glucosamine in the general population.

Link Icon 12 comments
By @zihotki - 3 months
From the article:

>> regular glucosamine use may be a marker for a healthy lifestyle, but it is hard to distinguish the confounding effects of a healthy lifestyle from the impact of regular supplementations in an observational study.

By @cryptichash - 3 months
Based on a quick survey [1], seems like various forms of glucosamine are not interchangeable. Doesn't this confound the study further given its unclear which supplements led to what outcomes?

[1] https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements-glucosamine/art...

By @dave333 - 3 months
Glucosamine seems to be taken to treat joint pain and osteoarthritis but would a general anti-inflammatory effect be what causes a reduction in mortality if any?
By @vjerancrnjak - 3 months
Interesting preliminary investigation but there’s no mathematics that can remove confounding factors for such small effects.
By @OutOfHere - 3 months
Glucosamine and independently chondroitin can provoke a slight allergic reaction. That's because they're often sea derived. Perhaps lab synthesized versions wouldn't have this issue. The reaction, although not serious, can be enough to discourage their use.
By @LeoPanthera - 3 months
For me this URL leads to a Wordpress login page.
By @beefman - 3 months
(2020)
By @WalterSear - 3 months
This is from 2020.
By @Khelavaster - 3 months
What if everyone got enough glycine while their blood sugar was adequate, so that their glucosamine levels topped up...
By @amelius - 3 months
> The inverse associations of glucosamine use with all-cause mortality seemed to be somewhat stronger among current than non-current smokers

So take glucosamine and start smoking? /s