Will A.I. Kill Meaningless Jobs?

The rise of artificial intelligence (A.I.) is prompting discussions about the future of jobs, particularly those deemed meaningless. Many workers, like Brad Wang, have experienced the frustration of engaging in tasks that feel pointless, leading to a broader societal reflection on the value of work. David Graeber's concept of "bullshit jobs" highlights that a significant portion of the workforce perceives their roles as lacking purpose. As A.I. technology advances, it is projected to automate around 300 million full-time jobs globally, particularly in administrative and middle management roles. This raises questions about whether the elimination of such jobs could ultimately benefit workers who find them psychologically degrading.

While some fear job loss, others suggest that A.I. could lead to the creation of more meaningful roles. Historical trends show that technological advancements often result in new job opportunities, although the transition may be challenging. Experts like Kevin Kelly argue that the automation of meaningless jobs could encourage individuals to seek more fulfilling work, prompting deeper reflections on their professional identities. However, there are concerns that new roles may not offer the same stability or opportunities for advancement, potentially hollowing out the middle class.

In the immediate future, many jobs may involve overseeing A.I. outputs, which could be equally unfulfilling. The ongoing evolution of work in the A.I. era will likely require a reevaluation of what constitutes meaningful employment and how society values different types of labor.