August 4th, 2024

A primer on the current state of longevity research

Longevity research has evolved since 2021, with increased funding and focus on cellular reprogramming. Companies are exploring induced pluripotent stem cells, indicating potential breakthroughs despite a long timeline for results.

Read original articleLink Icon
SkepticismCuriosityAppreciation
A primer on the current state of longevity research

reprogramming as a core strategy for their longevity research. The field of longevity research has seen significant changes since 2021, with increased funding and interest from both federal and private sectors. The focus on sirtuins, proteins linked to aging, has not yielded substantial results, with recent studies indicating that NAD+ precursor supplementation does not significantly enhance longevity, although it may improve healthspan. The perception of longevity research has shifted from pseudoscience to a more respected scientific field, with more NIH grants dedicated to aging research. However, the timeline for meaningful outcomes from this funding is expected to be long-term, potentially spanning a decade.

Cellular reprogramming, particularly through the discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and partial cellular reprogramming, has emerged as a promising area. This approach allows for rejuvenation at a cellular level without fully converting cells into stem cells, thus retaining their original identity while benefiting from age-related improvements. Companies like Altos Labs and Retro Biosciences are leveraging this technology, indicating a growing interest in translating these scientific advancements into therapeutic applications. Overall, while the field is still in its early stages, the potential for breakthroughs in longevity research appears to be increasing, driven by innovative approaches and substantial financial backing.

Related

Beyond longevity: The DIY quest to cheat death and stop aging

Beyond longevity: The DIY quest to cheat death and stop aging

Individuals like Ken Scott engage in DIY biohacking for longevity, aiming to live until 500 through extreme lifestyle changes and unregulated interventions. Biohackers push aging research boundaries, bypassing FDA regulations. Despite concerns, biohackers drive innovation in longevity research.

New insights into transcription factors and chromatin remodeling

New insights into transcription factors and chromatin remodeling

Researchers at the University of Queensland reveal insights on aging control mechanisms, focusing on transcription factors and chromatin remodeling. AP-1 plays a key role in gene regulation, offering potential for age-related disease interventions and healthspan enhancement.

'Supermodel granny' drug extends life in animals

'Supermodel granny' drug extends life in animals

A drug targeting interleukin-11 extended lab mice lifespans by 25%, improving health and reducing cancer rates. Human testing is ongoing, with potential anti-ageing effects sparking interest in molecular ageing mechanisms.

Anti-ageing 'supermodel granny' drug extends life in mice by 25%

Anti-ageing 'supermodel granny' drug extends life in mice by 25%

A drug targeting interleukin-11 extended lab mice lifespans by 25%, improving health and reducing cancer. Its effects on human ageing are uncertain, despite promising results. Researchers aim to slow ageing by manipulating molecular processes.

Cellular Reprogramming Improves Cognition in Aged Rats

Cellular Reprogramming Improves Cognition in Aged Rats

Researchers found that prolonged expression of reprogramming factors improved cognitive function and reduced epigenetic age in aged rats, suggesting potential therapeutic approaches for age-related cognitive decline. Further research is needed.

AI: What people are saying
The comments reflect a diverse range of opinions and concerns regarding longevity research.
  • Some commenters question the focus on longevity over quality of life, suggesting that older individuals may not desire extended life.
  • There is curiosity about the application of longevity research to other organisms, such as bacteria, and the potential for computational models.
  • Several users express skepticism about the methodologies and implications of longevity research, particularly regarding gene therapy and cellular reprogramming.
  • Notable figures and treatments in the field, like Bryan Johnson and rapamycin, are mentioned as significant omissions in the article.
  • Concerns are raised about the ethical and societal implications of rapid advancements in longevity research, paralleling issues seen in AI development.
Link Icon 13 comments
By @Kalanos - 2 months
Thanks for the review.

Surprised not to see any mention of interleukins and metformin. [Warning - metformin linked to birth defects]

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07701-9

The more I learn about molecular biology/oncology, the more skeptical I am of longevity research. The pathways are usually broad hub genes that shouldn't be touched. E.g. Myc is an oncogene. As a rule of thumb, any time you see "reprogramming," be skeptical.

Gene therapy for neurodegenerative diseases should not be considered longevity.

By @Jeff_Brown - 2 months
Longevity research is likely to improve quality of life too. Diseases that have been tackled separately since forever -- cancer, Alzheimer's, diabetes -- are starting to be seen as manifestations of a single underlying process, which is what we aim to stop.
By @sorokod - 2 months
Don't know the average age of partipants here but I assume it is low enough to explain the focus on longevity rather then on the quality of life.

If you get a chance to interview a person in their late 80s, ask if they would welcome a life extension of say, 20 years.

By @anon84873628 - 2 months
Surprised there is no mention of Bryan Johnson. Whatever you think of his methods, he has certainly done a lot to popularize longevity research in the last couple years.

Also no mention of rapamycin and related research on immune modulating pathways.

By @reasonattlm - 2 months
It is hard to cover everything related to longevity, given that there is a vast diversity of approaches, and a lot of work presently taking place.

https://www.agingbiotech.info shows how much work goes into just making lists for just the industry side of the house.

Read a few of the lengthy end of year posts at Fight Aging! to see just how much there is to comment on (e.g. https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2023/12/a-look-back-at-2... ), and Fight Aging! only covers an opinionated selection of the full spectrum of research and development.

By @davidelettieri - 2 months
Should diet / exercise be the primary mechanisms to support longevity?

https://gero.usc.edu/2022/04/28/valter-longo-longevity-diet/

edit: also this is quite interesting https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01lxyzc

By @readthenotes1 - 2 months
Life is too short to spend time reading a essay that could have been condensed to:

Nothing solid. Work in progress.

By @drillsteps5 - 2 months
I'm (somewhat) surprised to not see DeGray or his SENS mentioned in the article or the discussion. I thought he and his approach gradually moved from the area of crazy science to (at least) one of the approaches attracting attention from some more mainstream researchers?

After all the "Hallmarks of Aging" (2013), more or less mainstream research article published in "Cell", looked at the aging process from a similar perspective.

If I understand correctly, at least one of SENS components - namely, AmyloSENS - is currently being targeted by a number of biotech startups, looking into use of senolytic drugs to clear up senescent cells.

DeGray himself is currently attempting a Robust Mouse Rejuvenation however from what I understand the results from trial 1 were more than modest, if not to say disappointing.

By @alphanumeric0 - 2 months
Sounds like the future is bright for the field and that it has lots of applications. I'd imagine future aging treatments would employ several of these methods together, say cell reprogramming for your organs, along with resetting some of those aging biomarkers.

It's funny that it was considered a pseudoscience for such a long time, when there's lot of clinical applications outside of trying to live longer. For me, as someone with celiac disease, I know the age of my intestines are probably older than most people, after constant damage from gluten. It'd be nice to have a cell reprogramming treatment for intestines.

By @dsign - 2 months
Does anybody know of any longevity research on bacteria?

If we can put together Boeings and LLMs, we can probably put together computational models of longevity for living beings... even if it's just for Mycoplasma genitalium. But I have never heard of one.

By @sriram_malhar - 2 months
Nice review.

But I get the ick. As with AI/ML research, it has tremendous political, social, economic, environmental consequences. As AI/ML has shown, the pace of development and availability has outpaced humans' ability to think through the consequences until they have already happened and are in the hands of very powerful techbros and oligarchs. I have no appreciation of Hinton and other leaders' change of heart about the catastrophic consequences of their research.

A PhD in Longevity research, should be evaluated for its philosophical deliberations as much as it pokes the edge of the state of art.